Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-13 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Lennart Poettering | So, maybe Type=transient is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this | word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses | that iirc) and describes pretty accurately what these kind of processes | are used for, i.e. transient, temporary,

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-13 Thread Mirco Tischler
Am 13.08.2010 12:49, schrieb Claes H: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: So, maybe Type=transient is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses that iirc) and describes pretty

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-13 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote: So [auditctl] would be something to set to Type=finish and ValidNoProcess=no. (Oh, and if you have a better suggestion for a name of ValidNoProcess= I am all ears too!) 'RequiresProcess='? Hmm, that would turn around the