Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided
to move the early-boot runtime dir to /run.
What is the benefit?
/dev/.run is just fine, and /dev is tmpfs backend, so that is fast.
/var is not tmpfs backend.
2011/3/28 Ludwig Nussel ludwig.nus...@suse.de:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote:
Instead
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:28, Ludwig Nussel ludwig.nus...@suse.de wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:28, Ludwig Nussel ludwig.nus...@suse.de wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org
wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently
On Monday 2011-03-28 16:25, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:28, Ludwig Nussel ludwig.nus...@suse.de wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) said:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org
wrote:
On Mon, 21.03.11 08:37, fykc...@gmail.com (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
The third version if this patch.
Changes since v2:
1. page_size() uses assert_se(sysconf(...)) to detect failure of
sysconf, abort if sysconf fails.
2011/3/19 Jan Engelhardt jeng...@medozas.de:
On Saturday 2011-03-19
On Sat, 19.03.11 06:05, Chen Jie (ch...@lemote.com) wrote:
2011/3/18 Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 14:40, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18,
On Sun, 20.03.11 05:28, fykc...@gmail.com (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
2011/3/19 Chen Jie ch...@lemote.com:
2011/3/18 Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org:
It's ~0.5 sec faster here with readahead on a SSD.
Each time runs readahead-replay may cause readahead-collect to record
more blocks
On Thu, 24.03.11 10:20, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@mail.ru wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, fykc...@gmail.com fykc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
2011/3/18 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, 22.03.11 20:53, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm about to enable pam_systemd globally, but now I am a bit unsure
where should it go in. I'd rather put it in default system-auth which
is included by most other modules; but it also includes some modules
that I am not
On Wed, 23.03.11 19:55, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote:
I think chroot can be a useful tool for jailing particular services into
subtrees of the fs hierarchy. Either in the way that the service itself
internally chroot()s (which Avahi does, as I think the only service
On Fri, 25.03.11 05:07, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided
to move the early-boot runtime dir to /run.
Applied (and fixed a few minor issues).
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
On Sun, 27.03.11 23:52, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
On Friday 2011-03-18 01:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 18.03.11 00:18, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
Meanwhile, I have two new suggestions.
I have one too (or actually Kay came up with it), and I
On Mon, 21.03.11 17:16, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
+SUBSYSTEM==tty, KERNEL==ttyAM*, TAG+=systemd
+SUBSYSTEM==tty, KERNEL==ttymxc*, TAG+=systemd
+SUBSYSTEM==tty, KERNEL==ttyPSC*, TAG+=systemd
Applied. Thanks a lot!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
On Monday 2011-03-28 23:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 25.03.11 05:07, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided
to move the early-boot runtime dir to /run.
Applied (and fixed a few minor issues).
Uhm, *cough*.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 23:46, Jan Engelhardt jeng...@medozas.de wrote:
On Monday 2011-03-28 23:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 25.03.11 05:07, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided
to move the early-boot
Ludwig Nussel wrote:
mount --bind /var/run /mnt
mount /var
mount -M /mnt /var/run
This doesn't work. It means there is a period during boot where
/var/run suddenly vanishes (when mount the separate /var).
You have to do:
mount DEV_OF_VAR /mnt
mount --bind /var/run /mnt/run
mount -M /mnt
On Mon, 28.03.11 23:46, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
On Monday 2011-03-28 23:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 25.03.11 05:07, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
Instead of the /dev/.run trick we have currently implemented, we decided
to move the early-boot
On Monday 2011-03-28 23:29, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 27.03.11 23:52, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
On Friday 2011-03-18 01:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 18.03.11 00:18, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
Meanwhile, I have two new suggestions.
I
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 00:11, Jan Engelhardt jeng...@medozas.de wrote:
On Monday 2011-03-28 23:55, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 28.03.11 23:46, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
On Monday 2011-03-28 23:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 25.03.11 05:07, Kay Sievers
On Tue, 29.03.11 00:21, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
It's the other way round.
We want to get rid of the hidden-files-in-/dev mess. Hence all those
dirs will move to /run/ and /var/run will simply point to that.
Ok that makes sense. But will /run stick around after initramfs
2011/3/28 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Sun, 20.03.11 05:28, fykc...@gmail.com (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Current readahead implementation has some problems:
1. It can't separate *real* block read requests from all read
requests(which includes more blocks read by the kernel's
22 matches
Mail list logo
