On 08/09/2012 05:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On 08/09/2012 10:04 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
On 08/09/2012 01:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On 08/09/2012 06:28 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
Hi, list
As you see in the subject, this question comes from a lazy guy like me,
who doesn't
---
Makefile.am|2 +-
man/localtime.xml | 93
man/timezone.xml | 90 --
units/systemd-timedated.service.in |2 +-
4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 92 deleti
keep other method for now, consider dropping later.
Supporting relative links here are problematic as timezones in
/usr/share/zoneinfo are often themselves symlinks (and symlinks to
symlinks), so this implamentation only supports absolute symlinks
"/usr/share/zoneinfo/" and relative symlinks start
---
src/shared/util.c | 19 +--
src/shared/util.h |1 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c
index 946b7d5..876eb62 100644
--- a/src/shared/util.c
+++ b/src/shared/util.c
@@ -4851,7 +4851,7 @@ finish:
r
'Twas brillig, and Peeters Simon at 09/08/12 22:26 did gyre and gimble:
>> Just installing this and logging in with gdm means that my session (as
>> listed in loginctl) is not listed as active (which obviously breaks ACLs
>> etc).
>>
>> If I try and manually activate my session (as my user or root)
> Just installing this and logging in with gdm means that my session (as
> listed in loginctl) is not listed as active (which obviously breaks ACLs
> etc).
>
> If I try and manually activate my session (as my user or root) I get:
>
>
> $ loginctl activate 2
> Failed to issue method call: No such de
Hi,
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 09/08/12 11:32 did gyre and gimble:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-188.tar.xz
I seem to get logind/loginctl issues with this release.
Just installing this and logging in with gdm means that my session (as
listed in loginctl) is
>From Lennart Poettering, the Fri 03 Aug 2012 at 21:49:11 (+0200):
> > However, this is not the case when running a systemd --user, then systemctl
> > --user foo.service will not print the corresponding journal logs, even if
> > there are some. So here is to a feature request :)
>
> This definitel
'Twas brillig, and Václav Pavlín at 09/08/12 08:39 did gyre and gimble:
> Lennart Poettering píše v St 08. 08. 2012 v 18:31 +0200:
>> If we present the user with a list like this we probably should show a
>> tree view of some kind since the unit file getty@.service might get
>> instantiated a coupl
2012/8/9 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 08/09/2012 04:28 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
>>
>> Hi, list
>>
>> As you see in the subject, this question comes from a lazy guy like me,
>> who doesn't read the systemd source code at all :P
>>
>> The silly question is if A is configured to 'Wants:B' and 'After:B',
On 08/09/2012 04:28 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
Hi, list
As you see in the subject, this question comes from a lazy guy like
me, who doesn't read the systemd source code at all :P
The silly question is if A is configured to 'Wants:B' and 'After:B',
will A start exactly after B is finished or after
On Wed, 08.08.12 21:14, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2012 05:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Tue, 07.08.12 16:01, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Lennart Poettering
> >> wrote:
> >>>(But please, don't
Heya,
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-188.tar.xz
CHANGES WITH 188:
* When running in --user mode systemd will now become a
subreaper (PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER). This should make the ps
tree a lot more organized.
* A new PartOf= unit dependen
On Thu, 09.08.12 11:22, Huang Hang (seakag...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Currently MIPS and ARM define syscall numbers for multiple ABI in one
> . The #define statments for each syscall are formated as:
>
> #define __NR_scname (BASE_OFFSET + sc_number)
>
> Thus we need a more generic regular expressio
2012/8/8 Lennart Poettering :
> On Wed, 08.08.12 19:59, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
>
>>
>> 2012/8/8 Lennart Poettering :
>> > On Wed, 08.08.12 12:07, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
>> >
>> >> After run dmesg i can see
>> >> [434765.990649] systemd-udevd[1186]: invalid rule
>> >> '/etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa-tool
On 08/09/2012 10:04 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 01:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On 08/09/2012 06:28 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
>>> Hi, list
>>>
>>> As you see in the subject, this question comes from a lazy guy like me,
>>> who doesn't read the systemd source code at all :P
>> He
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:07:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 06.08.12 16:52, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > For libvirt, we (will soon) have a daemon (virtlockd) which maintains
> > exclusive fcntl() based locks on disk images/devices, on behalf of both
> >
On 08/09/2012 01:59 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On 08/09/2012 06:28 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
Hi, list
As you see in the subject, this question comes from a lazy guy like me,
who doesn't read the systemd source code at all :P
Hey, no need to read the source code :). Please see the man pa
Lennart Poettering píše v St 08. 08. 2012 v 18:31 +0200:
> On Tue, 07.08.12 16:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> I am not sure we should include the units from "list-unit-files" in the
> output of "list-units", as this would increase the output quite a bit,
> and would be hardly he
On 08/09/2012 06:28 AM, WANG Chao wrote:
> Hi, list
>
> As you see in the subject, this question comes from a lazy guy like me,
> who doesn't read the systemd source code at all :P
Hey, no need to read the source code :). Please see the man page:
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/sys
20 matches
Mail list logo