On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 06:55:56 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov
> wrote:
>> В Tue, 21 May 2013 15:17:23 -0700 Kaz Kylheku пишет:
>>> The workaround is, at that point, to unplug the device
>>> and plug it back in. This will trigger a udev event (with
>
]] Oleksii Shevchuk
> > > For security reasons. It will be better if user will not have access to
> > > own cores by default (situation is the same with journal backend in
> > > upstream now).
>
> > Why?
>
> When apps like gpg/lastpass/whatelse-with-passwords crashes, then user
> probably
> wi
On 01/08/2013 12:27 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.01.13 12:19, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Will there still be a way to turn this off from the kernel command line?
>> (I don't see anything on the wiki page.)
>
> biosdevname had this, and we have been thinking of addin
On Wed, 22 May 2013 06:55:56 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov
wrote:
> В Tue, 21 May 2013 15:17:23 -0700 Kaz Kylheku пишет:
>> The workaround is, at that point, to unplug the device
>> and plug it back in. This will trigger a udev event (with
>> the "reinserted" attribute equal to "0": since no TTY sess
В Tue, 21 May 2013 15:17:23 -0700
Kaz Kylheku пишет:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 19:58:35 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov
> wrote:
> > В Wed, 15 May 2013 21:19:38 -0700
> > Kaz Kylheku пишет:
> >
> >>
> >> Can you at least tell me how to get agetty to start on a system
> >> that does not have my patch, w
On Thu, 16 May 2013 19:58:35 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov
wrote:
> В Wed, 15 May 2013 21:19:38 -0700
> Kaz Kylheku пишет:
>
>>
>> Can you at least tell me how to get agetty to start on a system
>> that does not have my patch, when a USB-Serial converter is
>> inserted which is marked as a console?
>
Le lundi 20 mai 2013 à 19:58 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> > is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
> > not merged, what is
Hello!
I am on an Arch Linux machine. Kernel is 3.9.3 x86_64, systemd 204.
I have two identical hard drives. Both have a gparted created GPT table and a
CLI created ext4 filesystem with no options other than -L (label).
Archiv_1 was created like two weeks before Archiv_2 (which was created right
> > For security reasons. It will be better if user will not have access to
> > own cores by default (situation is the same with journal backend in
> > upstream now).
> Why?
When apps like gpg/lastpass/whatelse-with-passwords crashes, then user probably
will not be very happy to have all that dat
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 17:05 +0300, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote:
> For security reasons. It will be better if user will not have access to
> own cores by default (situation is the same with journal backend in
> upstream now).
Why?
> Yeah, I'll add some, if idea with temporary files will be accepted in
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 03:14:15PM +0200, Vaclav Pavlin wrote:
> From: Václav Pavlín
>
> systemctl default-target NAME will set the default target.
> If the NAME is not specified, the default target is printed out.
Hi,
this departs from current command structure in systemctl, where
there are alwa
> Ideally for this case it'd be a pipe; that way we avoid writing a
> potentially large file to disk only to write a smaller version again.
I thought about that. With cores there is no way to do transparent
piping with postproc. All tools mmap cores, so in real world they will
be dumped anyway..
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:30 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > in this mail, you will find a patch which resolves the problem, that
> > 'systemctl is-enabled' does not work for templated units.
> Appli
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
> ---
> man/hostnamectl.xml| 8
> man/journalctl.xml | 10 ++
> man/localectl.xml | 8
> man/timedatectl.xml| 8
> src/hostname/hostnamectl.c | 1 +
> src/journal/co
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> in this mail, you will find a patch which resolves the problem, that
> 'systemctl is-enabled' does not work for templated units.
Applied!
> See also https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55318 for
> reference
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes.
> As a result, the old process may still be running when the new one is
> started.
> After a watchdog failure the service is in an undefined state.
> Using the normal sh
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:20:15AM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> ---
> src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 22 +-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Applied!
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freed
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 19:09 +0300, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote:
> Introduce configuration file: /etc/systemd/coredump.conf with
> configurable core dumps backend storages (journal/file/both/none),
> per storage size limits and preprocessing.
Who would want "both" and why? Oh, though maybe you answer t
'Twas brillig, and Andrey Borzenkov at 21/05/13 11:26 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and James Buren at 20/05/13 18:28 did gyre and gimble:
>>> Files such as /etc/machine-info have an incompatibility with systemd in
>>> regards to ho
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and James Buren at 20/05/13 18:28 did gyre and gimble:
>> Files such as /etc/machine-info have an incompatibility with systemd in
>> regards to how
>> it writes and/or parses them. Take the following sample:
>>
>> PRETTY_HOSTN
'Twas brillig, and James Buren at 20/05/13 18:28 did gyre and gimble:
> Files such as /etc/machine-info have an incompatibility with systemd in
> regards to how
> it writes and/or parses them. Take the following sample:
>
> PRETTY_HOSTNAME="\'\"\$\`\\"
>
> Systemd will translate this to: '"$`\
>
Le lundi 20 mai 2013 à 19:58 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > So I planned to warn if the unit are directly in /lib, but I know there
> > is some distribution that didn't choose this path yet. So when /usr is
> > not merged, what is
22 matches
Mail list logo
