On 22 July 2013 23:56, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
network-online.target has no requirement for pingtest.service. All that
this configuration does is delaying network-online.target by at most 60
seconds, that's all. If network is not up at this point - too bad.
That ping switch
Hi all,
Is there any limitation on file types which can act as a valid unit file
for systemd? I have seen .socket, .mount, .path and of-course .service.
Or any file with valid syntax can act as a systemd unit file?
Thanks
Shakeel
___
systemd-devel
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:21:00PM +0500, Muhammad Shakeel wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any limitation on file types which can act as a valid unit
file for systemd? I have seen .socket, .mount, .path and of-course
.service.
Or any file with valid syntax can act as a systemd unit file?
No,
'Twas brillig, and Damian Ivanov at 23/07/13 13:01 did gyre and gimble:
Hey guys,
udev/systemd/pulseaudio/lirc should provide a maximum amount of
hotplugging, there are dozens of questions and bug reports on the net
about
the creative X-fi USB sound card on Linux. The sound itself works,
-Original Message-
From: Kay Sievers [mailto:k...@vrfy.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:12 PM
To: Reshetova, Elena
Cc: Lennart Poettering; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Ware, Ryan R;
Schaufler, Casey; walyong@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Patch for Smack labelling
'Twas brillig, and Kai Hendry at 24/07/13 08:10 did gyre and gimble:
On 22 July 2013 23:56, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
network-online.target has no requirement for pingtest.service. All that
this configuration does is delaying network-online.target by at most 60
seconds,
'Twas brillig, and Tony Seo at 24/07/13 01:57 did gyre and gimble:
Hello.
I had analyzed my systemd by using systemd-analyze plot.
But I caught a something wrong related with boot sequence time.
After I started my board, I checked the first boot image about 8 sec.
What do you use to
'Twas brillig, and Colin Walters at 20/07/13 23:50 did gyre and gimble:
So OSTree sets up systemd inside a chroot - /usr is a read-only bind
mount, and /var is a bind mount outside the root to a shared location.
Furthermore, /sysroot points to the real root.
Since last time we discussed
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:55:22PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
shell-completion/systemd-zsh-completion.zsh | 49
-
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
I'm working on integrating libvirt with systemd-machined for cgroups
setup and hitting a number of problems
The first was that v205 ignores all parameters passed though as scope
properties in the DBus CreateMachine call. So I upgraded to v206 which
seems to have fixed that.
When something goes
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 06:50:13PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
So OSTree sets up systemd inside a chroot - /usr is a read-only bind
mount, and /var is a bind mount outside the root to a shared location.
Furthermore, /sysroot points to the real root.
Since last time we discussed this:
We used to call
systemd-tmpfiles --prefix=/dev --create --remove
systemd-udevd
systemd-tmpfiles --create --remove
which caused a bug:
The first call would create dead device nodes, udev would change
permissions on these nodes, before the second call to tmpfiles would
reset the permissions
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm working on integrating libvirt with systemd-machined for cgroups
setup and hitting a number of problems
A further discovery - if I pass MemoryAccounting=yes as a scope
property, then the process gets immediately killed by
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Instead allow negation in the prefix filtering, to restrict the
second call to apply to everything but /dev:
systemd-tmpfiles --prefix=!/dev --create --remove
It's unfortunate that ! is a shell meta character. Maybe
- would be
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Instead allow negation in the prefix filtering, to restrict the
second call to apply to everything but /dev:
systemd-tmpfiles --prefix=!/dev
We used to call
systemd-tmpfiles --prefix=/dev --create --remove
systemd-udevd
systemd-tmpfiles --create --remove
which caused a bug:
The first call would create dead device nodes, udev would change
permissions on these nodes, before the second call to tmpfiles would
reset the permissions
On Wed, 24.07.13 15:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Instead allow negation in the prefix filtering, to restrict the
second call to apply to everything but /dev:
systemd-tmpfiles --prefix=!/dev
On Wed, 24.07.13 16:08, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
Indentation is borked. Please fix.
Please use two strv arrays, one prefix array, and one exclude_prefix
array.
And introduce --exclude-prefix= to control the latter.
---
v2: use --prefix=-/dev, rather than --prefix=!/dev to avoid
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:36:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm working on integrating libvirt with systemd-machined for cgroups
setup and hitting a number of problems
A further discovery - if I pass
---
man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml | 3 ++-
src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c | 24 +---
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml b/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml
index 405a9f1..b0f2d9c 100644
--- a/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml
+++
The opposite of --prefix, allows specifying path prefixes which should
be skipped when processing rules.
---
man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml| 7
shell-completion/systemd-zsh-completion.zsh | 1 +
src/tmpfiles/tmpfiles.c | 50 +
3
On Wed, 24.07.13 11:25, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:
static char **include_prefixes = NULL;
+static char **exclude_prefixes = NULL;
static const char conf_file_dirs[] =
/etc/tmpfiles.d\0
@@ -1018,6 +1019,21 @@ static bool item_equal(Item *a, Item *b) {
Hi Tony,
Please keep the replies on the list as others may find your posts useful
or be able to help.
The full plot svg would still be useful. Ideally post it somewhere and
then include a link.
I'm not sure why dietsplash.service wasn't tracked, but it should really
be shown if it is indeed
On Wed, 24.07.13 14:13, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
I'm working on integrating libvirt with systemd-machined for cgroups
setup and hitting a number of problems
The first was that v205 ignores all parameters passed though as scope
properties in the DBus CreateMachine
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:40:21PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 24.07.13 11:25, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:
static char **include_prefixes = NULL;
+static char **exclude_prefixes = NULL;
static const char conf_file_dirs[] =
/etc/tmpfiles.d\0
On Wed, 24.07.13 12:21, Muhammad Shakeel (muhammad_shak...@mentor.com) wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any limitation on file types which can act as a valid unit
file for systemd? I have seen .socket, .mount, .path and of-course
.service.
Or any file with valid syntax can act as a systemd unit
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
When something goes wrong with the CreateMachine DBus call though all I
ever seem to get back is Input/output error.
After strace'ing systemd-machined I find the real error
recvmsg(5, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Once I fixed the unit name to removing the leading '/', I hit a second
error
recvmsg(5, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
Hello.
As I'm a starter in systemd, I want to ask you a fundamental question.
That is how to understand existing relation from dependent and starting
perspective.
If you check a image file I attached, it' more clear.
Actually, I have studied systemd structure to add my processes in
В Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:10:01 +0800
Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi пишет:
On 22 July 2013 23:56, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
network-online.target has no requirement for pingtest.service. All that
this configuration does is delaying network-online.target by at most 60
seconds,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Tony Seo tonys...@gmail.com wrote:
When I first read a manpage which explains [Unit] option, I find a
Wants=.
For example, I make a A.service which has an Want = B.service.
If A.service is started by systemd, I think that B.service will be started
after
Hello
I am using Arch Linux, and testing systemd-206 with linux-3.10.2 on
shutdown, sometimes randomly there is a long delay until user@0.service
timeouts then systemd kills it.
1) Boot machine
2) Login as root
3) Execute systemctl reboot or reboot/poweroff/etc.
I see this behaviour in a real
On 24.7.2013 20:50, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 24/07/13 14:07, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi escribió:
Hello
I am using Arch Linux, and testing systemd-206 with linux-3.10.2 on
shutdown, sometimes randomly there is a long delay until user@0.service
timeouts then systemd kills it.
I am seeing a
With thousands of units, doing a daemon-reload puts a surprisingly
huge CPU and memory burden on the system. Has anyone profiled why? I'd
like to get started on optimizing this, but I'll obviously need to
understand where the problem is first.
--
David Strauss
| da...@davidstrauss.net
| +1
Signed-off-by: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar
---
units/systemd-udev-settle.service.in | 1 -
units/systemd-udev-trigger.service.in | 1 -
units/systemd-udevd-control.socket| 1 -
units/systemd-udevd-kernel.socket | 1 -
4 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
El 24/07/13 15:40, Armin K. escribió:
I have been seeing the same behaviour for a long time (since 19x
releases).
Can't be the same, there were no .scope units in that releases.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
New options:
* -e, --pager-end
* -r, --reverse
* -x, --catalog
* -k, --dmesg
* --after-cursor
* --file
* --root
* --dump-catalog
* --force
Modified options:
* --this-boot - --boot=
Also reorganized the options to match the manual page, similar to
systemctl.
---
Using --boot now completes to
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:26 PM, David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
With thousands of units, doing a daemon-reload puts a surprisingly
huge CPU and memory burden on the system. Has anyone profiled why? I'd
like to get started on optimizing this, but I'll obviously need to
understand
On 25 July 2013 00:56, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you really want all your services that depend on network being up to
fail if your AP is busy and needs 61 seconds to establish connection?
Firstly I use a PI with a wired connection with netctl ifplugd. I
don't know if there
On 24 July 2013 20:26, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Also as the previous enable would have written the .wants symlink, ti's
probably work doing a rm -f
/etc/systemd/system/network-online.target.wants/pingtest.service to
ensure it's cleaned out properly (in theory it shouldn't do
On 25 July 2013 12:55, Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi wrote:
Though if you take a look at http://ix.io/6Rz you can see `systemctl
show -p Requires network-online.target` does not work for some
reason. I was expecting it to say darkice.service. I probably just
don't understand how dependencies work
41 matches
Mail list logo
