Op 07-08-13 02:26, Andy Lutomirski schreef:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On 6 Aug 2013 18:32, Bryan Kadzban br...@kadzban.is-a-geek.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Tom Gundersen
Hi all,
I have a few things that need to get run after waking up my laptop
(things like hdparm to set device power options/spindown time).
I created oneshot, remainafterexit services for those and made them
wanted by multi-user.target.This works fine for the first boot.
As I consider these
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Mathijs Kwik math...@bluescreen303.nl wrote:
I have a few things that need to get run after waking up my laptop
(things like hdparm to set device power options/spindown time).
I created oneshot, remainafterexit services for those and made them
wanted by
Hello systemd developers,
I found that systemd automatically tries to load ipv6 and autofs kernel
modules, when they are not compiled in.
Could you give me a hint what is not working, when they are neither provided as
kernel modules nor compiled in?
In case of autofs I found that automount
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)
mho...@de.adit-jv.com wrote:
2. What impact do I have to expect in case the kernel does not provide
ipv6 functionality?
I think the main problem is in case you were to somehow insmod the
ipv6 module after boot, in which case it
It was 2013-07-15 pon 15:22, when Maciej Wereski wrote:
diff --git a/man/tmpfiles.d.xml b/man/tmpfiles.d.xml
index 519f9bc..92157b5 100644
--- a/man/tmpfiles.d.xml
+++ b/man/tmpfiles.d.xml
@@ -229,6 +229,21 @@ L/tmp/foobar ----
/dev/null/programlisting
Hello.
Now, I have studied systemd for optimizing systemd on my board.
After edited several units, I would like to delete some device
configuration units existing on my picture from
systemd-analyze(best-dream-boy.blogspot)
I read the manual pages about systemd.device, I tried to delete device
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Tony Seo tonys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Now, I have studied systemd for optimizing systemd on my board.
After edited several units, I would like to delete some device configuration
units existing on my picture from systemd-analyze(best-dream-boy.blogspot)
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 07-08-13 02:26, Andy Lutomirski schreef:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On 6 Aug 2013 18:32, Bryan Kadzban br...@kadzban.is-a-geek.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at
Thank you for your friendly answer.
After I recevied your mail, I have aimed to complete to make server-client
model.
In my view, I didn't still know how to use a service option in service
configuration file.
The seceario I want to make is like this:
*A..service is a server program and
I understand what you mean, but I think that I will cut the time for
loading device unit if I keep those from appearing on my plot.
I want to do a try to temporarily disappear some kinds of device units and
then I'm supposed to measure boot speed depending a board of
mine.(Actually, I believe
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:36:01PM +0200, Ronny Chevalier wrote:
---
src/core/dbus-execute.c | 3 +--
src/core/dbus-job.c | 11 ++-
src/core/dbus-manager.c | 14 +++---
src/core/unit.c | 48 ++--
4 files changed, 28
Hi, all
I have a question after looking fstab-generator.c. I hope someone can
help me.
In add_mount(), if nofail=true, Before=$post won't be added to
xxx.mount:
[..]
if (post !noauto !nofail !automount)
fprintf(f,
Before=%s\n,
post);
why doing this?
Hi Tony,
best to my experiences, I doubt that suppressing the loading of device units
will speed up systemd that much. There are other major parts that far more
significantly delay the startup (cgroups in some cases, loading the unit set at
startup, executing the generators, and finally
14 matches
Mail list logo
