On 11/30/2013 02:28 AM, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
If you're willing to use nginx instead, it's fairly straightforward. I'd
have to research the options for Apache.
I would be willing, but that is not the point. I have to give the
presentation to my colleges and they have to use it at our cl
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> And smtpprox looks like it's a real daemon – when you start it, it
> continues to run waiting for connections. For this, Type=oneshot is
> wrong, and the default Type=simple should be right. (This also means
> KeepAfterExit= can be remove
В Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:27:00 +0100
Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Tue, 26.11.13 01:00, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 24.11.13 22:36, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting case (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=85202
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:03 PM, wrote:
> I'm trying to launch a perl service using systemd.
>
> The perl script is 'smtpprox'
> (https://github.com/jnorell/smtpprox/blob/master/smtpprox)
>
> The unit file I created is
>
> cat /etc/systemd/system/smtpprox.service
> [Unit]
On Nov 29, 2013 9:52 PM, "Cecil Westerhof" wrote:
>
> On 11/29/2013 08:59 AM, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 29.11.13 00:11, Cecil Westerhof (cecil.wester...@snow.nl) wrote:
I have done a trial presentati
I'm trying to launch a perl service using systemd.
The perl script is 'smtpprox'
(https://github.com/jnorell/smtpprox/blob/master/smtpprox)
The unit file I created is
cat /etc/systemd/system/smtpprox.service
[Unit]
Description=smtpprox
Requ
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 02:39 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 28.11.13 00:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> (zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
> Instead we should add some code to macro.h which turns off the the
> warning with the #pragma stuff only if it detects it is being run on
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Lukasz Skalski
wrote:
> I added also assert_return(!bus->is_kernel, -ENOTSUP) to sd_bus_get_owner()
> function until ioctl(KDBUS_CMD_NAME_QUERY) is not implemented yet.
It's on the way in, so I removed the last hunk. Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
_
Thanks for the patch, Zbyszek!
CANTATE DOMINO CANTICUM NOVUM
QUIA MIRABILIA FECIT
Laércio
2013/11/28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:33:29PM -0200, Laércio de Sousa wrote:
> > If/when these patches are released, then systemd-multi-seat-x, in its
> > current form, will
I added also assert_return(!bus->is_kernel, -ENOTSUP) to sd_bus_get_owner()
function until ioctl(KDBUS_CMD_NAME_QUERY) is not implemented yet.
---
src/libsystemd-bus/bus-control.c | 52 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lib
On Fri, 29.11.13 09:33, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Find my comments below please.
>
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> > wrote:
> >> Can someone explain the pro
On Fri, 29.11.13 01:57, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2013 1:30 AM, "Cecil Westerhof" wrote:
> >
> > How does systemd compare to xinitd?
>
> Did you mean inetd/xinetd?
>
> systemd's .socket units are very similar (many existing programs, like
> sshd, can be moved dire
On 11/29/2013 01:12 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Cecil Westerhof
wrote:
Just to clarify, "stop" (and, by extension "restart") is also up to
the implementer of the unit file. There just happens to be a default,
unlike with "reload." See the service and exec
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Cecil Westerhof
wrote:
>> Just to clarify, "stop" (and, by extension "restart") is also up to
>> the implementer of the unit file. There just happens to be a default,
>> unlike with "reload." See the service and exec man pages for details.
>> Regardless, "restart"
On 11/29/2013 08:59 AM, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
On Fri, 29.11.13 00:11, Cecil Westerhof (cecil.wester...@snow.nl) wrote:
I have done a trial presentation about systemd. One of the questions
there was: when a restart of for exampl
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Lukasz Skalski
wrote:
> ---
> src/libsystemd-bus/bus-kernel.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://li
On 11/29/2013 04:00 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 29.11.13 01:32, Cecil Westerhof (cecil.wester...@snow.nl) wrote:
Your cronjobs do not run in a systemd-logind session (though they
could), but they /do/ run with your uid, so you would be able to see
them in the split-by-uid mode at leas
---
src/libsystemd-bus/bus-kernel.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd-bus/bus-kernel.c b/src/libsystemd-bus/bus-kernel.c
index 84d84df..f2b130b 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd-bus/bus-kernel.c
+++ b/src/libsystemd-bus/bus-kernel.c
@@ -593,7 +593,8 @@
'Twas brillig, and Cecil Westerhof at 28/11/13 23:40 did gyre and gimble:
> With rsyslog you can send everything to one machine and evaluate the
> logs of several machines on that one machine. As I understand it,
> journald is mend to work locally. Is there a way to centralize the usage
> of journa
Hi,
Find my comments below please.
On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>> Can someone explain the process level management?
>
> Right now, it's possible to do directly in the cgroups file system,
> but w
20 matches
Mail list logo
