Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:24:10PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > On 12/05/2013 12:28 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > >2013/12/5 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > >>On 12/05/2013 06:50 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > >>>ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe wacom_w8001 > >>Add a configuration file called wac

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:38:45PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:27:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:50:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > the new rule now is: > > > > > > SUBSYSTEM=="tty|pnp", KERNEL=="ttyS

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] util: fix misuse of memcmp

2013-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:30:04PM +0800, Yuxuan Shui wrote: > --- > src/shared/util.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c > index b4ed2c4..d685966 100644 > --- a/src/shared/util.c > +++ b/src/shared/util.c > @@ -5919,7 +5

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nspawn: fix buggy mount_binds, now works for bind-mounted files

2013-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Applied. Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] src/core

2013-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:16:08AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 05.12.13 14:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > ([email protected]) wrote: > > > src/core/device.c | 10 ++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > New commits: > > commit e775289d56ace2f8d23

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] src/core

2013-12-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.12.13 14:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ([email protected]) wrote: > src/core/device.c | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > New commits: > commit e775289d56ace2f8d23e62ed79316d71332d6d05 > Author: Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek > Date: Thu Dec 5 00

Re: [systemd-devel] Presentation was a success

2013-12-05 Thread poma
On 05.12.2013 21:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > It was a lot of work, but the presentation about systemd/journald was a > success. I got several colleges interested: so mission accomplished. > There are some things I still should respond to, but I am a ‘little’ > tired, so I will respond later. >

[systemd-devel] File system gets remounted read-only after using nspawn

2013-12-05 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
Hi; I've been playing with systemd-nspawn with Gentoo. I'm running systemd 208, and the normal Gentoo stage3 image [1], installing systemd 204 inside it. Everything works great, but for some reason after powering off the container, the file system where it resides gets remounted read-only. I should

Re: [systemd-devel] help with dependicies

2013-12-05 Thread John Davis
Hello I have a solution. falcon on irc pointed out that the wants and requires need to be in the [unit] section. Once that change was made this config worked. -- John F. Davis 6 Kandes Court Durham, NC 27713 919-888-8358 独树一帜 ___ systemd-devel maili

[systemd-devel] Presentation was a success

2013-12-05 Thread Cecil Westerhof
It was a lot of work, but the presentation about systemd/journald was a success. I got several colleges interested: so mission accomplished. There are some things I still should respond to, but I am a ‘little’ tired, so I will respond later. Thank everyone who helped me in making this presenta

Re: [systemd-devel] Last question about systemd before my presentation

2013-12-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.12.13 07:40, Cecil Westerhof ([email protected]) wrote: > Today I am giving my presentation about systemd/journald for a not > very enthusiastic public. I would like some last answers on a ‘few’ > questions. > > I understood that you could let systemd start-up the services > sequ

[systemd-devel] help with dependicies

2013-12-05 Thread John Davis
Hello I have four unit files. 1. xxx.target 2. tmp-testy.mount 3. tmp-testy_ro.mount 4. temp-testy_rw.mount I want the xxx.target to automatically start the three .mount unit files on boot. Item, 2. tmp-testy is a union mount of the two unit files 3. and 4. In order to get this to work, I have

[systemd-devel] ptyfwd (nspawn): Correctly handle output redirection

2013-12-05 Thread Luke T . Shumaker
Ping http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-November/thread.html#14661 Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] test: add run-qemu script

2013-12-05 Thread Ronny Chevalier
from Alexander Graf's script: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg72389.html --- Hi, It adds a little script which try to find a QEMU binary on the system and enable kvm if it's available. This script is used when running QEMU in the tests. (We can also specify a different kernel and initramfs) R

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Tom Gundersen
On 5 Dec 2013 07:48, "Peter Hutterer" wrote: > > When I fired up F20 on one of my laptops here I noticed that inputattach > doesn't work anymore for serial Wacom devices. It used to be started through > udev, but that doesn't work anymore. So moving to a systemd service it is, > but I'd like a rev

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread David Timothy Strauss
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > The above statement not withstanding, but the Type and RemainAfterExit > applies only to ExecStart. This unit calls modprobe in ExecStartPre > which is always expected to do something and return. So this branch of > the thread really doesn't a

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:27:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:50:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > the new rule now is: > > > > SUBSYSTEM=="tty|pnp", KERNEL=="ttyS[0-9]*", ATTRS{id}=="WACf*", \ > > ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}="wacom-inputattach@%k.service

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" at 05/12/13 14:30 did gyre and gimble: > > On 12/05/2013 01:57 PM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:53 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" >> wrote: >>> Never use a systemd unit to call modprobe. >> And, even if you did, modprobe would be

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:50:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > the new rule now is: > > SUBSYSTEM=="tty|pnp", KERNEL=="ttyS[0-9]*", ATTRS{id}=="WACf*", \ > ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}="wacom-inputattach@%k.service",TAG+="systemd" > > > And the matching [email protected] file shows: > > [

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/05/2013 01:57 PM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:53 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: Never use a systemd unit to call modprobe. And, even if you did, modprobe would be Type=oneshot (maybe also with RemainAfterExit=true), definitely not Type=simple. You never a

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] util: fix misuse of memcmp

2013-12-05 Thread Yuxuan Shui
--- src/shared/util.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c index b4ed2c4..d685966 100644 --- a/src/shared/util.c +++ b/src/shared/util.c @@ -5919,7 +5919,7 @@ int shall_restore_state(void) { return 1;

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] nspawn: fix buggy mount_binds, now works for bind-mounted files

2013-12-05 Thread Shawn Landden
--- src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 42 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c index dd7337b..c1212c0 100644 --- a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c +++ b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ static int mount_

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC][PATCH] bus: Add destination field to sd_bus_message_new_signal() and sd_bus_emit_signal()

2013-12-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.12.13 13:09, Simon McVittie ([email protected]) wrote: > > On 05/12/13 12:13, Lukasz Skalski wrote: > > destination - the unique bus name for the destination for the signal > > or NULL to emit to all listeners. > > This is rarely-needed functionality, but sometimes necess

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC][PATCH] bus: Add destination field to sd_bus_message_new_signal() and sd_bus_emit_signal()

2013-12-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.12.13 13:13, Lukasz Skalski ([email protected]) wrote: > destination - the unique bus name for the destination for the signal > or NULL to emit to all listeners. > > This path makes libsystemd-bus API more consistent and similar > to GDBUS API, for reference: Hmm, I though

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread David Timothy Strauss
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:53 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Never use a systemd unit to call modprobe. And, even if you did, modprobe would be Type=oneshot (maybe also with RemainAfterExit=true), definitely not Type=simple. ___ systemd-devel mailin

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/05/2013 12:28 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: 2013/12/5 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": On 12/05/2013 06:50 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe wacom_w8001 Add a configuration file called wacom-w8001.conf to /etc/modules-load.d directory with the following content to load the mo

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC][PATCH] bus: Add destination field to sd_bus_message_new_signal() and sd_bus_emit_signal()

2013-12-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On 05/12/13 12:13, Lukasz Skalski wrote: > destination - the unique bus name for the destination for the signal > or NULL to emit to all listeners. This is rarely-needed functionality, but sometimes necessary. If anyone is going to replicate the client-facing functionality of the dbus-daemon using

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Michael Biebl
2013/12/5 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > > On 12/05/2013 06:50 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: >> >> ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe wacom_w8001 > > > Add a configuration file called wacom-w8001.conf to /etc/modules-load.d > directory with the following content to load the module > ( /etc/modules-load.d/wac

[systemd-devel] [RFC][PATCH] bus: Add destination field to sd_bus_message_new_signal() and sd_bus_emit_signal()

2013-12-05 Thread Lukasz Skalski
destination - the unique bus name for the destination for the signal or NULL to emit to all listeners. This path makes libsystemd-bus API more consistent and similar to GDBUS API, for reference: gboolean g_dbus_connection_emit_signal (GDBusConnection *connection,

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd unit review requested

2013-12-05 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/05/2013 06:50 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe wacom_w8001 Add a configuration file called wacom-w8001.conf to /etc/modules-load.d directory with the following content to load the module ( /etc/modules-load.d/wacom-w8001.conf ) # Load wacom_w8001 at boot wacom_

Re: [systemd-devel] Last question about systemd before my presentation

2013-12-05 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Dec 5, 2013 11:27 AM, "Cecil Westerhof" wrote: > > On 12/05/2013 10:08 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: >> >> > One of the problems mentioned is that services can be started only >> when they are used for the first time. As I understood it, you can make >> sure that a service is always loaded, so t

Re: [systemd-devel] Last question about systemd before my presentation

2013-12-05 Thread Cecil Westerhof
On 12/05/2013 10:08 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > One of the problems mentioned is that services can be started only when they are used for the first time. As I understood it, you can make sure that a service is always loaded, so that there is no waiting time the first time it is called. This i

Re: [systemd-devel] Last question about systemd before my presentation

2013-12-05 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
Partial answer: On Dec 5, 2013 8:40 AM, "Cecil Westerhof" wrote: > > Today I am giving my presentation about systemd/journald for a not very enthusiastic public. I would like some last answers on a ‘few’ questions. > > I understood that you could let systemd start-up the services sequential for d

Re: [systemd-devel] The whole su/pkexec session debate

2013-12-05 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 14:37 +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > >> But then gnome-session should simply call ReleaseSession() on the bus >> itself.. > > I'd rather have some sort of API where a particular process is the > "session leader", and