On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
I have been looking at our bugs [1-10, there are others too] related to
enabling/disabling of units and following of symlinks. Currently this
is an unintuitive mess and some changes will have to be made.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
So using templated units, we could do for example :
SELinuxContext=staff_u:staff_r:%s_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
In the spirit of making isolation easy, it would be neat to have a
built-in convention for selinux isolation in systemd
hello,
Im trying to port Cinnamon to porteus.
Porteus is a slackware based distro which work with modules.
The problem is that Cinnamon works the best with systemd and slackware
refuses to use systemd.
Now I want to try to make systemd work on a porteus system so that I
have a slackware based
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
hello,
Im trying to port Cinnamon to porteus.
Porteus is a slackware based distro which work with modules.
The problem is that Cinnamon works the best with systemd and slackware
refuses to use systemd.
Now I want to try
2013/12/27 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
they do need the IPC_OWNER capability, to fake credentials
on kdbus.
Oh, I guess we should just allow
Op 30 dec. 2013, om 13:36 heeft Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
hello,
Im trying to port Cinnamon to porteus.
Porteus is a slackware based distro which work with modules.
The problem is
Hello.
Since I had gotten the message from you, I had learned socket program for
normal test.
After making sample processes like server and client, I tested them in many
cases.
But, when I tested my sample codes, the common problem was founded that the
server process always waited for acceptance
Koen Kooi schreef op 30-12-2013 15:50:
Op 30 dec. 2013, om 13:36 heeft Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
hello,
Im trying to port Cinnamon to porteus.
Porteus is a slackware based distro which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047304
---
src/core/service.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/service.c b/src/core/service.c
index 2557579..f8502a8 100644
--- a/src/core/service.c
+++ b/src/core/service.c
@@ -3347,6 +3347,9 @@
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:00:06AM -0600, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
I have been looking at our bugs [1-10, there are others too] related to
enabling/disabling of units and following of symlinks.
Am 30.12.2013 18:53, schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
I found another one:
- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
Autocompletion does not propose template units which have some instances
enabled
may I notice this one in context of autocompletion too
2 lines after the changed line we assign err to efi_get_variable(...)
unconditionally, so it makes no sense to initialize it to some value.
---
src/boot/boot-efi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/boot/boot-efi.c b/src/boot/boot-efi.c
index 33840b6..1c80126
This was introduced in e1770af812 (2012-02-03, swap: replace failure
boolean by result enum).
It doesn't do any harm as it most likely will get optimized away anyway,
but maybe for readability?
---
src/core/swap.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Tony Seo tonys...@gmail.com wrote:
That situation continued whether Accept= true or not in service unit.
The reason I encouraged you to learn more about socket programming is
because this Accept= option isn't some sort of optimization or nuanced
thing you just
14 matches
Mail list logo
