Hi,
On 17.01.2014 14:22, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi Mikko,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Ylinen, Mikko mikko.yli...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Could we first try to optimize the BMP loader? Also, could you share
your test image so I
Hi,
I want to install gitlab (sidekiq and unicorn are required) on my fresh
fedora installation.
New to systemd manager, I've some trouble install this wonderful app.
If I've understand systemd, I have to create 3 files : one per service (1
for sidekiq, 1 for unicorn, and 1 for gitlab).
there is already *Type=forking *in the service section
2014/1/23 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 10:51 +0100, Marwan Rabbâa wrote:
that is not very useful for me. /var/www/gitlab/script/sidekiq is just
a litle startup script for sidekiq
Maybe this script *needs* a tty? Maybe it doesn't run as user git,
e.g. wrong rights, wrong home directory?
Try to put a set -x at the top of the script and restart it, then
you'll see where it failed. Then, look into that program and find out
why it failed. If in doubt, pepper it with debug
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 10:51 +0100, Marwan Rabbâa wrote:
that is not very useful for me. /var/www/gitlab/script/sidekiq is just
a litle startup script for sidekiq
#!/usr/bin/env sh
cd /var/www/gitlab
/usr/local/bin/bundle exec sidekiq -q
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 11:16 +0100, Marwan Rabbâa wrote:
there is already Type=forking in the service section
Indeed, I got confused between your two services (the second one doesn't
have it).
And the systemctl status output says the exit code was 1, not 0, so it
has indeed nothing to do with
Marwan, he specified it, see above the line directly after [Service]
[Service]
Type=forking
User=git
WorkingDirectory=/var/www/gitlab
Environment=RAILS_ENV=production
One thing that makes me wonder is however his sidekick.target thingy.
It says that Redis and Postgresql should be started,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 17.01.2014 14:22, Tom Gundersen wrote:
We could then special case the particular bitmasks that
correspond to BGRX and skip the loop. Does that sound like something
you could work with?
This sounds
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 17.01.2014 14:22, Tom Gundersen wrote:
We could then special case the particular bitmasks that
correspond to BGRX and skip the loop.
I am running systemd 208 on Fedora 20.
There are 2 cpu cgroup attributes that I need to set to allow realtime for
some daemons: cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime_us.
For the memory cgroup I need to set memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes for one of
my slices.
Do you plan to add support for setting
@Lennart
ping?
I'm not sure what to do to fix that properly.
Thanks
David
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Monaco m...@0x01b.net wrote:
I was having trouble getting a session on seat1 with v208, so I
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:33:37AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Djalal Harouni at 20/01/14 12:18 did gyre and gimble:
Hi Coling,
Coling please I've some questions regarding what you have posted, see
below.
I'm trying to debug another bug in logind logic:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:51:05AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Djalal Harouni at 22/01/14 09:24 did gyre and gimble:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:19:08AM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:01:58AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Indeed, in
Hi,
As I mused on LWN[1] recently, I was wondering whether it was possible
to have user units be able to hook into namespaces (namely the
PrivateNetwork= and PrivateTmp= from systemd.exec(5) and more if other
namespacing options are added in the future).
I'm assuming that is not possible now to
Has anyone looked at using socketat() for this? It's unclear whether
that syscall actually exists in any supported form; it's certainly not
documented.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/407495/
___
systemd-devel mailing list
To join a namespace, you'll need a file descriptor for the namespace
so you can run setns() [1]. It's possible to share a file descriptor
by keeping it open while forking (which is how socket activation
works) or passing it over a Unix domain socket [2].
I know this doesn't really answer your
Our wiki page on the topic [1] was relevant before, but I'm pretty
sure we dropped ControlGroupAttribute= from the options. Any answer to
Barry's question here should probably involve an update to that wiki
page, too.
[1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MyServiceCantGetRealtime/
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:43:52 -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
To join a namespace, you'll need a file descriptor for the namespace
so you can run setns() [1]. It's possible to share a file descriptor
by keeping it open while forking (which is how socket activation
works) or passing it
I think the intention for your needs (a lot of namespace sharing for a
family of services) would be to run another systemd in a namespece
using something like systemd-nspawn, libvirt-lxc, LXC, a user session,
or similar. Basically, a systemd instance would run in the namespace
itself. Is that a
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 13:21:30 -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
I think the intention for your needs (a lot of namespace sharing for a
family of services) would be to run another systemd in a namespece
using something like systemd-nspawn, libvirt-lxc, LXC, a user session,
or similar.
2014/1/23 David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net:
Has anyone looked at using socketat() for this? It's unclear whether
that syscall actually exists in any supported form; it's certainly not
documented.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/407495/
grep -ir socketat linux-3.12 doesn't return
21 matches
Mail list logo