Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: note that entire sections can now be ignored

2014-05-18 Thread Tom Gundersen
Applied. Thanks! -t On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Michael Marineau michael.marin...@coreos.com wrote: Prefixing a section name with X- will cause it and all of its contents to be silently ignored as of commit 342aea19. --- man/systemd.unit.xml | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 6

[systemd-devel] Unit swap.target Unit boot.mount has failed.

2014-05-18 Thread poma
Unit swap.target Unit boot.mount has failed. systemd-212-12.git342aea1.20140517.fc21.x86_64 # journalctl ... [0.00] kernel: Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x86_64 root=UUID=... debug initrd=/initramfs-3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x86_64.img ... [

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

2014-05-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.05.2014 22:02, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez: El 17/05/14 14:56, Dave Reisner escribió: On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:39:47PM -0400, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: This is the standard* way used to pass special linker/compiler flags such as -fPIE and -pie * Standard in the sense it is

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

2014-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 17.05.14 12:39, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: This is the standard* way used to pass special linker/compiler flags such as -fPIE and -pie * Standard in the sense it is understood by many other packages and commonly used by distributions. I really don't get

[systemd-devel] Spelling fix: privilege

2014-05-18 Thread Nis Martensen
The spelling police is on guard :) Patch attached. From 935238b9af1580464b95021a2bddc55036984546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nis Martensen nis.marten...@web.de Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:43:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix spelling of privilege --- NEWS |2 +-

Re: [systemd-devel] Spelling fix: privilege

2014-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 18.05.14 15:49, Nis Martensen (nis.marten...@web.de) wrote: The spelling police is on guard :) Patch attached. Thanks! Applied! From 935238b9af1580464b95021a2bddc55036984546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nis Martensen nis.marten...@web.de Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:43:18 +0200

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

2014-05-18 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 18/05/14 06:47, Lennart Poettering escribió: On Sat, 17.05.14 12:39, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: This is the standard* way used to pass special linker/compiler flags such as -fPIE and -pie * Standard in the sense it is understood by many other packages and

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] core: Filter by state behind the D-Bus API, not in the systemctl client.

2014-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 28.04.14 12:08, da...@davidstrauss.net (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: From: David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net Thanks! Applied! (I do wonder though whether we should try harder to keep the client tools compatible with the server side, so that systemctl -M and systemctl -H continue

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] build: Honour SUID_CFLAGS and SUID_LDFLAGS

2014-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 18.05.14 11:47, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: OK, Let's try the attached patch instead. Thanks, applied! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] analyze: read host and system information from remote

2014-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 23.04.14 23:03, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote: This makes systemd-analyze plot read host information from remote. While we are it show if this is a virtualized system. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76498 Merged both patches! Sorry for the delay! Thanks!

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-notify --ready is not reliable

2014-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 24.04.14 23:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:50:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 23.04.14 15:15, Eelco Dolstra (eelco.dols...@logicblox.com) wrote: Hi all, I've noticed that the command systemd-notify

Re: [systemd-devel] Unable to override systemd-udevd.service

2014-05-18 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
В Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:07:37 +0200 David Gstir da...@sigma-star.at пишет: [Resend to mailing list, because my client somehow swallowed half the Cc fields - sorry about that.] Hi! I encountered the same issue, running version 195-13.45.1 from opensuse in a container: On 23.04.2014, at

Re: [systemd-devel] timed out waiting for device dev-disk-by\x2duuid

2014-05-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On May 17, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: No, the system definitely does not attempt to mount it if there's a missing device. Systemd never executes /bin/mount at all in that case. A prerequisite for the mount attempt is this line: [1.621517]

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] core/cryptsetup: Add WantsMountFor option to enable fallback to password request for crypt mounts.

2014-05-18 Thread Przemek Rudy
Combined into one ptach. I see it is not clear how this patch is related to the cryptsetup password timeout. Note the cryptsetup timeout is done by the cryptsetup service. Thus it will occur only if the cryptsetup is reached and the key is not valid. But that is true only for the key file on

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix a few compiler warnings

2014-05-18 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
--- src/journal/test-journal-stream.c | 2 +- src/libsystemd/sd-login/sd-login.c | 2 +- src/shared/util.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/journal/test-journal-stream.c b/src/journal/test-journal-stream.c index 8e1d08d..4f56edb

Re: [systemd-devel] Unit swap.target Unit boot.mount has failed.

2014-05-18 Thread poma
This is one solution. Déjà vu. systemd-212-13.git8891f69.20140518.fc21.x86_64 /etc/dracut.conf.d/omit_dracut-module-systemd.conf # dracut modules to omit omit_dracutmodules+= systemd # dracut --kver 3.15.0-0.rc5.git2.9.fc21.x86_64 -vf Executing: /sbin/dracut --kver

Re: [systemd-devel] cryptsetup vs. swapon/fsck (some kind of race condition)

2014-05-18 Thread Andy Kittner
On 16/05/14 16:31, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 16.05.14 03:20, Andy Kittner (andy.kitt...@gmail.com) wrote: Minimal configurations? Are you kidding? If you want something minimal, then just use devtmpfs, and don't involve userspace at all in creating device nodes. This is not about