Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] path: follow symbolic link for parent path

2014-12-17 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Thanks Zbigniew, I have only fixed the fallback: case and missed to fix the real case where we use the name_to_handle. Could you please change that too. It will look something like this: @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ int path_is_mount_point(const char *t, bool allow_symlink) { -r =

Re: [systemd-devel] Using `systemctl edit` on invalid unit names

2014-12-17 Thread Ivan Shapovalov
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 06:35:09 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 04:21:32PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: On Saturday 13 December 2014 at 15:34:01, Ronny Chevalier wrote: 2014-12-13 11:33 GMT+01:00 Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com:

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] path: follow symbolic link for parent path

2014-12-17 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/17/2014 02:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: --- src/shared/path-util.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/shared/path-util.c b/src/shared/path-util.c index

[systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
For the record: It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS doesn't have support for it at the moment. Umut ___ systemd-devel mailing list

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] path: follow symbolic link for parent path

2014-12-17 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/17/2014 02:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: --- src/shared/path-util.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [systemd-devel] [dm-devel] multipath breaks with recent udev/systemd

2014-12-17 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 12/16/2014 11:18 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:10:44PM -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:31:44AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: [ .. ] So during bootup it's anyone's guess who's first, multipath or udev. And depending on the timing either

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] mount: auto-detect iSCSI and FCoE as requiring network

2014-12-17 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: I guess it's enough to add the 'fd' to systmed sd_event_add_io() and call mnt_table_parse_mtab() when a change is detected. (As already implemeted in the original Chris' patch.) Karel, if I got this right, then the new

Re: [systemd-devel] Using `systemctl edit` on invalid unit names

2014-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:29:38AM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 06:35:09 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 04:21:32PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: On Saturday 13 December 2014 at 15:34:01, Ronny Chevalier wrote:

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Add FDB support

2014-12-17 Thread Alin Rauta
Hi Tom, I've formatted the patch based on our previous discussions. This one has support only for adding FDB entries. An example configuration is like below: [Match] Name=em1 [Network] DHCP=v4 [BridgeFDB] MACAddress=44:44:12:34:56:71 VLANId=9 [BridgeFDB] MACAddress=44:44:12:34:56:70 VLANId=2

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Add FDB support

2014-12-17 Thread Alin Rauta
Signed-off-by: Alin Rauta alin.ra...@intel.com --- Makefile.am | 1 + man/systemd.network.xml | 22 +++ src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c| 56 ++- src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c | 15 +- src/network/networkd-fdb.c

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Add FDB support

2014-12-17 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/17/2014 03:35 PM, Alin Rauta wrote: Hi Tom, I've formatted the patch based on our previous discussions. This one has support only for adding FDB entries. An example configuration is like below: [Match] Name=em1 [Network] DHCP=v4 [BridgeFDB] MACAddress=44:44:12:34:56:71 VLANId=9

Re: [systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: For the record: It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS doesn't have support for it at the moment. For what precisely? The mount

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] mount: auto-detect iSCSI and FCoE as requiring network

2014-12-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 17.12.14 13:13, Karel Zak (k...@redhat.com) wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: I guess it's enough to add the 'fd' to systmed sd_event_add_io() and call mnt_table_parse_mtab() when a change is detected. (As already implemeted in the

Re: [systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: For the record: It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it

Re: [systemd-devel] journald syslog forwarding

2014-12-17 Thread Holger Winkelmann [TP]
Hi, sorry for delay in reply.. Journal carries messages from the initramfs. We cannot send them from the initramfs, unless we bring up the network then, which we don't want to do just for this purpose. But those messages are stored in /run/log, and then flushed to /var/log, and the uploader

Re: [systemd-devel] journald syslog forwarding

2014-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 08:30:41PM +, Holger Winkelmann [TP] wrote: Hi, sorry for delay in reply.. Journal carries messages from the initramfs. We cannot send them from the initramfs, unless we bring up the network then, which we don't want to do just for this purpose. But those

Re: [systemd-devel] name_to_handle_at() with UBIFS

2014-12-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 17.12.14 20:48, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: For the record: It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] path: follow symbolic link for parent path

2014-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:48:55AM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/17/2014 02:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] path: follow symbolic link for parent path

2014-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 08:59:15AM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: Thanks Zbigniew, I have only fixed the fallback: case and missed to fix the real case where we use the name_to_handle. Could you please change that too. It will look something like this: @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ int

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemctl: print unit package in status

2014-12-17 Thread Spencer Baugh
When printing the status of a unit, open a connection to the session bus and query PackageKit for the package that the unit file belongs to. Print it if PackageKit knows. --- src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 32 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [systemd-devel] How to create a systemd service?

2014-12-17 Thread jenia.ivlev
That's really nice information. Thanks a lot Mantas. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel