On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:24:13PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 18:18, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:50:29PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
Le 04/02/2015 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
Thanks again for the quick review! Fixed if not commented (sorry,
some issues were back due to the refactoring).
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Didier Roche
Le 04/02/2015 17:10, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:05, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As per
IRC discussion, (and after giving up the busy loop for a rewrite with
epool), I did rebase it
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 16:38 +0100]:
Sure, I can only recommend again: in the the glue code that calls out
to systemctl from service, you can add the code to use --no-block
or --job-mode=ignore-dependencies , if you notice you are in shutdown
mode...
Yeah, I agree that given all the
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 7e3254b3bae19221afefdb87b61ff92c755fd2f4
Author: Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
Date: Wed Feb
Le 04/02/2015 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
Thanks again for the quick review! Fixed if not commented (sorry, some
issues were back due to the refactoring).
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
+typedef struct Clients {
+struct Manager *manager;
One would expect pressing the button to go to an overview / show
applications mode, we thus map it to leftmeta, the Windows key.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658602#c17
---
hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:05, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As per
IRC discussion, (and after giving up the busy loop for a rewrite with
epool), I did rebase it again on sd_event.
I'm only proposing there up
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
+typedef struct Clients {
+struct Manager *manager;
+int fd;
+dev_t devnum;
+size_t cur;
+size_t max;
+int pass;
+double percent;
+size_t buflen;
+
+
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
On Wed, 04.02.15 18:18, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 17:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:06:44AM -0800, Lennart
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put into generator.late they would be ignored anyway.
This is particularly
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 03.02.15 16:34, Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
the UID/GID on entire filesystem sub-trees given to containers with
userns is a real unpleasant thing to have to deal with. I'd not want
Of
Okay, Tom fixed this with 057255fbbf2ecb1c46e025b04087fa9340d9880d.
2015-02-03 21:50 GMT+01:00 Daniel Buch boogiewasth...@gmail.com:
Hi,
This commit 51ddf61540976fc7b09ce5 solved systemd-resolved, but broke
systemd-timesyncd. Atleast on my system.
dbuch@dbuch-laptop ~ % lscpu | grep -i
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 18
2015-02-04 13:42 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
enabled, but the former not, then systemd currently reads
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:36 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 20:19, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
You're missing an essential point here: there's a distinction between
skipping reloads for services which have not not been dispatched, and
skipping reloads for
On Wed, 04.02.15 20:19, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 16:38 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:25, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:27 +0100]:
On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:26, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 04.02.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
OK, let's try this again, with an example:
a) you have one service mydaemon.service
b) you have a preparation service called
mydaemon-convert-config.service that
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:10, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:36 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 20:19, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
You're missing an essential point here: there's a distinction between
skipping reloads
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 22:02 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:26, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
Isn't this change also relevant to the creation of .wants symlinks, and
avoiding generating .wants links from the wrong targets?
As in, the case where you
Am 04.02.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
OK, let's try this again, with an example:
a) you have one service mydaemon.service
b) you have a preparation service called
mydaemon-convert-config.service that takes config from somewhere,
converts it into a suitable format for
Am 04.02.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 04.02.2015 um 21:57 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
OK, let's try this again, with an example:
a) you have one service mydaemon.service
b) you have a preparation service
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 21:57 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
OK, let's try this again, with an example:
a) you have one service mydaemon.service
b) you have a preparation service called
mydaemon-convert-config.service that takes config from somewhere,
converts it into a suitable
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
enabled, but the former not, then
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit
[grr, accidentally dropped the mailing list on my previous reply]
2015-02-04 21:48 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-04 2:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 02:05,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Patrik Flykt
patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 17:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Is the resume event detected somehow in systemd?
The kernel unfortunately provides no API for this right now. However,
if logind is the
Hi again,
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 19:00 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
Hey,
I've recently been using systemd-networkd to great success on a few of
my machines here. However I ran into an interesting problem on at least
2 machines so far. I've included the output of journal for
Hello!
Does it possible to create container as regular user? Oh what capabilities
i need to add to create container not using root?
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
___
systemd-devel mailing list
Thank you Lennart for your explanation about the enqueuing. Sounds
reasonable. And helps me understand! :-)
Here I reply to you a little out of order:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
This is something that can be fixed by adding stricter deps
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:50:01PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
From 74291bace60f64efb96287f8170df4c38058cc46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:42:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fsckd daemon for inter-fsckd communication
Add systemd-fsckd multiplexer which accepts multiple systemd-fsck
instances to
Hey,
I rewrote a version of this patch including the feedback on the list. As
per IRC discussion, (and after giving up the busy loop for a rewrite
with epool), I did rebase it again on sd_event.
I'm only proposing there up for review the 2 first patches (without
plymouth communication,
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 567b467..384ae02 100644
--- a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
+++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
@@ -4578,7 +4578,7 @@ static
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:53:20PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
[grr, accidentally dropped the mailing list on my previous reply]
2015-02-04 21:48 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-04 2:12 GMT+01:00
On 02/04/2015 09:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 63 ++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 384ae02..2d70ff1 100644
--- a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
+++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
- correctly check for local vs. remote transport
- return after receiving error from expand_names()
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 083b618..567b467 100644
---
- report actual load error for units which could not be loaded
- make unit_find_paths() report all kinds of errors it encounters
(for consistency)
- consistently handle not-found errors in cat() and edit()
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 54 +++
1
On 2015-01-28 at 22:29 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
On 2015-01-28 at 20:15 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 18.01.15 04:21, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to fix this bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88401
The
That indicates that the systemd or apache inside the container do not
correctly make use of the the socket passed into them. You need to
make sure that inside the container you have pretty much the same
.socket unit running as on the host. The ListStream lines must be
identical, so that
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 00:47 +0100, poma wrote:
On 03.02.2015 18:43, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:36 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02.02.2015 19:58, David Herrmann wrote:
As I'm not really interested in hacking on network-managers, I've
decided to
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:46:10PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
One would expect pressing the button to go to an overview / show
applications mode, we thus map it to leftmeta, the Windows key.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658602#c17
Applied.
Zbyszek
Looks good. Pushed all four.
Zbyszek
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:56:57AM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
- report actual load error for units which could not be loaded
- make unit_find_paths() report all kinds of errors it encounters
(for consistency)
- consistently handle not-found errors in
Hi guys,
I'm not exactly sure if I'm asking the right question in the right
place, please let me know if this is not the right place for this question.
I'm setting up SR-IOV for my Intel I350 igb on CentOS 6.6
(2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64, udev 147) using udev. I have modified a rule I
used in
On Tue, 03.02.15 21:03, Brandon Philips (bran...@ifup.co) wrote:
Hey Lennart-
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Brandon Philips bran...@ifup.co wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
I have added DefaultDependencies= for you now:
On Wed, 04.02.15 02:21, Jay Faulkner (j...@jvf.cc) wrote:
I am not particularly fond of the idea of adding a completely new
command line option for this though. Maybe we can find another way for
this.
For example, one option could be to split the seccomp syscall
blacklist in two:
On Wed, 04.02.15 10:08, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put
On Wed, 04.02.15 04:40, Mikhail Morfikov (mmorfi...@gmail.com) wrote:
1. When I try to connect for the very first time, I get a timeout, even
though the container
is working. I can cancel the connection immediately, and reconnect after 2-3
sec and then the
page shows up. All subsequent
On Wed, 04.02.15 10:43, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
Looks
First: Please let me know if this is an inappropriate place to ask this
# systemctl restart syslog.socket rsyslog.service
seems to always work. But
# systemctl restart rsyslog.service syslog.socket
, the opposite sequence, seems to sometimes fail (details below). I'm
wondering: Why is that?
On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-03 21:40 +0100]:
It's really about synchronous waiting on jobs. If you synchronously
wait for completion of jobs that are ordered against the job your are
part of yourself, then things will
On Wed, 04.02.15 11:13, Peter Valdemar Mørch (pe...@morch.com) wrote:
First: Please let me know if this is an inappropriate place to ask this
# systemctl restart syslog.socket rsyslog.service
seems to always work. But
# systemctl restart rsyslog.service syslog.socket
, the opposite
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 17:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Is the resume event detected somehow in systemd?
The kernel unfortunately provides no API for this right now. However,
if logind is the one suspending the machine, then it sends out a
PrepareForSleep() signal before
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
enabled, but the former not, then systemd currently reads that so that
the sysv one is overriden by the
On 02/02/15 20:49, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, just to mention this. You can also just write:
# systemctl start /home/myuser/data
That's good to know, thanks.
This will automatically be translated to
home-myuser-data.mount. systemctl has some logic built in to
translate strings that
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:27 +0100]:
On Wed, 04.02.15 08:56, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-03 21:40 +0100]:
It's really about synchronous waiting on jobs. If you synchronously
wait for completion of jobs that are ordered against the job
Hey!
Maybe something from your initrd is acting weird?
As far as I can tell, nothing from the initrd is running. It's
basically ArchLinux's mkinitcpio run on gentoo - thus, pretty standard stuff.
It might be interesting to strace PID 1 while you are doing this. And
if that doesn't help
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 32
1 file changed, 16
On 03/02/15 23:43, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The way I understand /usr/local, it is the place where the admin
himself places his own scripts and stuff, as extensions for the host
OS.
Yes, that view is consistent with the FHS (and e.g. Debian Policy's
interpretation of the FHS). ./configure
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:53, Peter Valdemar Mørch (pe...@morch.com) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
This is something that can be fixed by adding stricter deps between
the service and the socket, so that the socket is always required to
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:29, Olaf Leidinger (ol...@mescharet.de) wrote:
Hey!
Maybe something from your initrd is acting weird?
As far as I can tell, nothing from the initrd is running. It's
basically ArchLinux's mkinitcpio run on gentoo - thus, pretty
standard stuff.
ps should tell you what
66 matches
Mail list logo
