binNF286gWdVu.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
Also allow getting time from time(2) when BUS_TRANSPORT_MACHINE.
v2: check for error
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On 24.03.2015 15:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Exactly because they do not require being upgraded in lock-step, doing
conversion to the local time locally is racy. Assuming we have up-to-date
timezone database
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24.03.2015 15:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Exactly because they do not require being upgraded in lock-step, doing
conversion to the local
Hi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:59:40PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
[...]
But it is not systemd's task to cover for missing functionality in the
cockpit architecture. We should not add redundant interfaces
/me hates the new thunderbird-enigmail
On 24.03.2015 14:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:59:40PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
Sorry about the encrypted email ... I hit the wrong button.
On
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24.03.2015 15:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Exactly because they do not require being upgraded in lock-step, doing
conversion to the local
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:59:40PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
Sorry about the encrypted email ... I hit the wrong button.
On 23.03.2015 19:07, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Kay Sievers
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
Sorry about the encrypted email ... I hit the wrong button.
On 23.03.2015 19:07, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Stef Walter
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Exactly because they do not require being upgraded in lock-step, doing
conversion to the local time locally is racy. Assuming we have up-to-date
timezone database locally, with the patch that was merged today
Hi Tom,
Nice. Thanks,
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 9:45 PM
To: Rauta, Alin
Cc: systemd Mailing List; Kinsella, Ray
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] libsystemd doesn't handle properly empty
messages from kernel
Hi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
This wouldn't work if fstype was NULL. We also have a list of network
filesystems,
whic I assume don't require a device, and we can consult this list instead of
including
it here. I pushed the patch with
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:24:38AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/timedate/timedated.c
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:24:38AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 24
1 file
Hi,
In recent systemd(from some month ago), when a unit has a mask for cpu
or blockio or memory, this mask is also propagated to siblings by
unit_get_target_mask().
According to some of comments, it seems intentional.
Could anyone explain why?
In our system, some of service have MemoryLimit=
Thanks Tobias!
I applied a tweaked version of this patch now. Please let me know in
case it does not work for you.
Most importantly, I dropped the change to the /usr handling, as we
don't really have a use-case for that at the moment (could be a
separate patch if needed). Also, dropped the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Accidentally dropped in 1aff20687f4868575.
---
Mount whatever the user asked to be mounted on / and /usr on the
kernel command line. Do less sanity check and do *not* bail out
when the mount device looks strange or does not exist.
This basically makes the changes for deviceless filesystems
from yesterday unnecessary and is in line with what
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Michael Olbrich
m.olbr...@pengutronix.de wrote:
---
man/systemd.automount.xml | 8 ++
man/systemd.mount.xml | 9 ++
src/core/automount.c | 209
--
src/core/automount.h
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
These are handled by a different driver than MemoryStick Pro.
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Thanks Tom!
I added the check for the rw /sys so that both the code path for fstab
as well as for the kernel cmdline are doing similar checks. I was
thinking about putting all the validation for both code paths into one
function, but there are so many small things that only make sense in
one of
Hi Tobias and Zbigniew,
This already went in, but I was just looking at it again.
Is there any reason the kernel commandline handling must be treated
differently here than the fstab handling? We already support
deviceless mounts (obviously) when specified in fstab without the need
for any
On 24/03/15 14:40, Stef Walter wrote:
On 24.03.2015 15:22, Tom Gundersen wrote:
It all comes down to what you intend the fields to mean. Now we mean
the field to mean the real localtime of the server (as seen from the
client), whereas you want it to mean the localtime the server thinks
it
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi Tobias and Zbigniew,
This already went in, but I was just looking at it again.
Is there any reason the kernel commandline handling must be treated
differently here than the fstab handling? We already support
deviceless
For overlayfs you need to check overlayfs and overlay.
24 марта 2015 г. 1:52 пользователь Tobias Hunger tobias.hun...@gmail.com
написал:
This allows for stateless systems.
---
src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 21 +
src/shared/util.c | 30
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:32:31PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:04:11AM -0700, Kay Sievers wrote:
Makefile.am|2
src/shared/time-dst.c | 329
On 24.03.2015 15:22, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24.03.2015 15:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Exactly because they do not require being upgraded in
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:04:11AM -0700, Kay Sievers wrote:
Makefile.am|2
src/shared/time-dst.c | 329
-
src/shared/time-dst.h |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:04:11AM -0700, Kay Sievers wrote:
Makefile.am|2
src/shared/time-dst.c | 329
-
src/shared/time-dst.h |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:32:31PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:04:11AM -0700, Kay Sievers wrote:
Hi there,
How do I figure out why or where something is stuck?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-03-25/systemd-start-issue.png
`journalctl -u surf -f` prints nothing.
Binary surf runs fine when I run it manually.
Many thanks,
___
systemd-devel mailing list
In the systemd-resolved manual we can read something like this:
The DNS servers contacted are determined from the global settings in
resolved.conf(5), the per-link static settings in .network files, and
the per-link dynamic settings received over DHCP.
1. Let's say that I have set all the
Hi,
I'm using the DHCPServer option within systemd-networkd along with
hostapd to provide a basic wireless access point on an embedded
system. When my client systems connect, they make a DHCP request that
includes a parameter request for a Domain Name Server (option
6)---standard fare I think.
And those arches don't get much testing too.
---
CODING_STYLE | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index b687e72..8934954 100644
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
- The destructors always unregister the object
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
/* Enforce the values of /etc/localtime */
if (getenv(TZ)) {
-fprintf(stderr, Warning: Ignoring the TZ variable.\n\n);
+fprintf(stderr, Warning: Ignoring the %s
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
/* Enforce the values of /etc/localtime */
if (getenv(TZ)) {
-fprintf(stderr, Warning: Ignoring the TZ
Hi Tom,
no, root=tmpfs rootfstype=tmpfs does *not* work without my patch. I
had thought it should, too, and I did try.
fstab-generator was silently ignoring root= since tmpfs is not a
device. So no mount unit for /sysroot...
Since fstab-generator did evaluate mount.usr* which did point to a
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Tobias Hunger tobias.hun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
no, root=tmpfs rootfstype=tmpfs does *not* work without my patch. I
had thought it should, too, and I did try.
fstab-generator was silently ignoring root= since tmpfs is not a
device. So no mount unit for
I liked having the DST information. It is a pity glibc doesn't export
this information.
avoid calling gmtime_r() and localtime_r() twice
deduplicate some strings
v2
---
src/timedate/timedatectl.c | 24
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
I liked having the DST information. It is a pity glibc doesn't export
this information.
v3
---
src/timedate/timedatectl.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/timedate/timedatectl.c b/src/timedate/timedatectl.c
index ab5c8a1..d529a0a 100644
---
I won't promise anything, but I'll give it a try later tonight.
It is a bit frightening under what kind of attention you people have to
work: Even this tiny patch made it onto phoronix and I just got my first
flame about ruining Linux.
___
systemd-devel
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
/* Enforce the values of /etc/localtime */
if
I liked having the DST information. It is a pity glibc doesn't export
this information.
---
src/timedate/timedatectl.c | 29 +++--
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/timedate/timedatectl.c b/src/timedate/timedatectl.c
index ab5c8a1..8daae54
Will result in slightly smaller binaries, and cuts out the branch, even if
the expression is still executed.
---
src/shared/macro.h | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/macro.h b/src/shared/macro.h
index 7f89951..02219ea 100644
---
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Shawn Landden sh...@churchofgit.com wrote:
I liked having the DST information. It is a pity glibc doesn't export
this information.
Yeah, date(1) could use and show that information too, I think.
Adding custom parsers to work-around glibc's development style was
On 2015-03-23 at 13:45 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:04:28PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
Hello,
is it possible/allowed/desired to support assigning ExecStartPre= and
similar options via dbus interface, i. e. in `systemctl set-property` or
46 matches
Mail list logo
