Re: [systemd-devel] Shutting down service using systemd-nspawn

> I implemented this now: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=c6c8f6e218995852350e5e35c080dec788c42c3f Thanks a lot. Sorry, have seen your mail to late - I'm trying out a new mua (sup) and I'm not that familiar with it yet. Do you think it makes sense to add something lik

Re: [systemd-devel] Supporting ExecStartPre= and friends in `systemctl set-property` or `systemd-run -p`

On 2015-05-06 at 18:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 06.05.15 19:53, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > I still think that being able to define and start group of units > > as one > > unit (pun unintended) is better in the long run. > > > > This really far exceeds o

[systemd-devel] LPC 2015 Boot, Init, and Config microconf RFC and Invitation

The Boot, Init, and Config microconference is inviting interested parties to comment on proposed topics and show their interest in attending. Proposed topics are at http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2015:boot_init_and_config, and include containers, tinification, systemd tuning, k/dbus, early k

Re: [systemd-devel] Shutting down service using systemd-nspawn

Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the explanation. > I'd be willing to take a patch that adds --kill-signal= that allows > changing the kill signal from SIGRTMIN+3 to anything else. With that > you could use --kill-signal=SIGTERM to get the behaviour you want... Hopefully someone else can help

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

В Wed, 6 May 2015 19:13:46 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > > Also, I think it's a bit pointless optimizing fsck invocations in > setups like this. I mean, if you cared about fsck runtime you probably > wouldnt use ext234 anyway, which are really the only file systems used > for / or /usr that

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

On Wed, 06.05.15 19:12, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > On Wed, 06.05.15 15:50, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Works for me... booted with "ro" on the kernel cmdline: > > > > $ systemctl status systemd-fsck-root.service > > ● systemd-fsck-root.service - F

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

On Wed, 06.05.15 15:50, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote: > Works for me... booted with "ro" on the kernel cmdline: > > $ systemctl status systemd-fsck-root.service > ● systemd-fsck-root.service - File System Check on Root Device >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-fsc

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

On Wed, 06.05.15 01:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > In the initramfs, we run systemd-fsck@.service. > In the real system we run systemd-fsck-root.service. Generate > a fake systemd-fsck-root.service if we are running a unit check > for the root file system. We don't re

Re: [systemd-devel] initrd mount inactive

On Thu, 30.04.15 15:20, aaron_wri...@selinc.com (aaron_wri...@selinc.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering wrote on 04/30/2015 02:39:45 > AM: > > On Wed, 29.04.15 12:09, aaron_wri...@selinc.com > > (aaron_wri...@selinc.com) wrote: > > > > > I applied those other commits you listed, and I took a loo

Re: [systemd-devel] journal-.gitignore-add-audit_type-from-name

On Thu, 30.04.15 19:42, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote: Zbigniew merged a similar patch today. Thanks! > > From 785b1367fedb912e91074360c0961209ac5dc9f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Daniel Buch > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:20:57 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] journal: .gitignore add

Re: [systemd-devel] Supporting ExecStartPre= and friends in `systemctl set-property` or `systemd-run -p`

On Wed, 06.05.15 19:53, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > I still think that being able to define and start group of units as one > unit (pun unintended) is better in the long run. > > This really far exceeds original scope of systemd-run which was > "quickly start something under s

Re: [systemd-devel] Supporting ExecStartPre= and friends in `systemctl set-property` or `systemd-run -p`

В Wed, 6 May 2015 18:37:00 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > On Wed, 06.05.15 05:52, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > On 2015-04-24 at 11:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Fri, 24.04.15 04:07, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > > - do `system

Re: [systemd-devel] Supporting ExecStartPre= and friends in `systemctl set-property` or `systemd-run -p`

On Wed, 06.05.15 05:52, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 2015-04-24 at 11:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 24.04.15 04:07, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > - do `systemd-run` twice and somehow set up the dependencies > > > between > > > t

Re: [systemd-devel] Supporting ExecStartPre= and friends in `systemctl set-property` or `systemd-run -p`

On Wed, 06.05.15 09:16, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: > > On 2015-04-24 at 11:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Fri, 24.04.15 04:07, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > >> > - do `systemd-run` twic

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: fix coding style

On Wed, 06.05.15 11:45, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote: Actually, we allow the line break there too, even though we prefer to not have it there. Applied anyway. Thanks! > --- > src/udev/net/ethtool-util.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/ud

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: systemctl: null-initialize pointer with cleanup attribute

On Wed, 06.05.15 08:32, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote: > Patch attached. (git send-email currently brokken) Looks good! Applied! Thanks! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesk

Re: [systemd-devel] Adopt processes spawned before /lib/systemd/systemd takes over as PID 1?

On Wed, 06.05.15 09:28, Matt Hoosier (matt.hoos...@gmail.com) wrote: > One final question on this topic: > > I'm not sure from the available discussion of the 'Alias=' directive in > systemd.unit(5) whether it might be possible for me to have two units: > > /lib/systemd/system/dummy-adopted-se

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

On 06.05.2015 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> Works for me... booted with "ro" on the kernel cmdline: >> >> $ systemctl status systemd-fsck-root.service >> ● systemd-fsck-root.service - File System Check on Root Device

Re: [systemd-devel] Adopt processes spawned before /lib/systemd/systemd takes over as PID 1?

One final question on this topic: I'm not sure from the available discussion of the 'Alias=' directive in systemd.unit(5) whether it might be possible for me to have two units: /lib/systemd/system/dummy-adopted-service.service ... [Unit] DefaultDependencies=no [Service] Typ

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Works for me... booted with "ro" on the kernel cmdline: > > $ systemctl status systemd-fsck-root.service > ● systemd-fsck-root.service - File System Check on Root Device >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-fsck-root.s

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

Works for me... booted with "ro" on the kernel cmdline: $ systemctl status systemd-fsck-root.service ● systemd-fsck-root.service - File System Check on Root Device Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-fsck-root.service; static; vendor preset: disabled) Active: inactive (dead) sinc

Re: [systemd-devel] Don't allow to restart emergency.service/rescue.service

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2015-05-06 13:40 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> 2015-05-06 1:49 GMT+02:00 Cameron Norman : > >> > +KillMode=process > >> > > >> > If I had to take a gues

Re: [systemd-devel] Don't allow to restart emergency.service/rescue.service

2015-05-06 13:40 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> 2015-05-06 1:49 GMT+02:00 Cameron Norman : >> > +KillMode=process >> > >> > If I had to take a guess I would say that it was desired to let the >> > shell do its own process

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] test-socket-util: Fix tests on machines without ipv6 support

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:18:31AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > The test for socket-util already has some code to only do certain tests > on machines with ipv6 support. However this was incomplete causing the > test to still fail on such machines, this patch adds the remaining cases > required to

Re: [systemd-devel] Don't allow to restart emergency.service/rescue.service

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2015-05-06 1:49 GMT+02:00 Cameron Norman : > > +KillMode=process > > > > If I had to take a guess I would say that it was desired to let the > > shell do its own process management, but Lennart can only know. Maybe > > KillMode=mixed

Re: [systemd-devel] Supporting ExecStartPre= and friends in `systemctl set-property` or `systemd-run -p`

On 2015-05-06 at 09:16 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Ivan Shapovalov > wrote: > > On 2015-04-24 at 11:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Fri, 24.04.15 04:07, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx...@gmail.com) > > > wrote: > > > > > > > - do `systemd-run` twice an

Re: [systemd-devel] Don't allow to restart emergency.service/rescue.service

2015-05-06 1:49 GMT+02:00 Cameron Norman : > +KillMode=process > > If I had to take a guess I would say that it was desired to let the > shell do its own process management, but Lennart can only know. Maybe > KillMode=mixed would be better? KillMode=mixed seems to work better, indeed, from a quick

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Generate a fake systemd-fsck-root.service in the initramfs

On 06.05.2015 07:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > In the initramfs, we run systemd-fsck@.service. > In the real system we run systemd-fsck-root.service. Generate > a fake systemd-fsck-root.service if we are running a unit check > for the root file system. We don't really care if the real fs

[systemd-devel] PATCH: systemctl: null-initialize pointer with cleanup attribute

Patch attached. (git send-email currently brokken) declarations with _cleanup_free_ attribute needs to be NULL initialized. From e242049410bb8373f8724ac24328e0f024b9929b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Buch Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:28:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] systemctl: null-initialize poi

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Restore udevadm settle timeout

Hi On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: >> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:36 PM, David Herrmann >> > wrote: >> >> > @@ -139,6 +142,9 @@ st

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tmpfiles: try to handle read-only file systems gracefully

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:11:57AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 08:50:38PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > On read-only filesystems trying to create the target will not fail with > > EEXIST but with EROFS. Handle EROFS by checking if the target already > > e

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: fix coding style

Patchset imported to github. Pull request: -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___ systemd-devel mailing