-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2016 09:46 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17 2016, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Hannes Reinecke writes:
>>> On 02/16/2016 07:03 PM, Sebastian Parschauer wrote:
On 16.02.2016 18:41, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Sebastian Parschauer
> w
On Wed, Feb 17 2016, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Hannes Reinecke writes:
>> On 02/16/2016 07:03 PM, Sebastian Parschauer wrote:
>>> On 16.02.2016 18:41, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Sebastian Parschauer writes:
> When stopping an MD device, then its device node /dev/mdX may still
> exist afterward
On Wed, Feb 17 2016, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:44:36PM +0100, Sebastian Parschauer wrote:
>> When stopping an MD device, then its device node /dev/mdX may still
>> exist afterwards or it is recreated by udev. The next open() call
>> can lead to creation of an inoperable MD dev
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:44:36PM +0100, Sebastian Parschauer wrote:
> When stopping an MD device, then its device node /dev/mdX may still
> exist afterwards or it is recreated by udev. The next open() call
> can lead to creation of an inoperable MD device. The reason for
> this is that a change e
Am Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:39:26 +0100
schrieb Kai Krakow :
> Am Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:35:24 +0100
> schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>
> > On Mon, 15.02.16 21:32, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Am Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:28:19 +0100
> > > schrieb Lennart Poettering :
> > >
> > > > On Sun
On 02/16/2016 07:03 PM, Sebastian Parschauer wrote:
On 16.02.2016 18:41, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Sebastian Parschauer writes:
When stopping an MD device, then its device node /dev/mdX may still
exist afterwards or it is recreated by udev. The next open() call
can lead to creation of an inoperable
Am Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:35:24 +0100
schrieb Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 15.02.16 21:32, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Am Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:28:19 +0100
> > schrieb Lennart Poettering :
> >
> > > On Sun, 14.02.16 13:49, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > > H
On 16.02.2016 18:41, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Sebastian Parschauer writes:
>> When stopping an MD device, then its device node /dev/mdX may still
>> exist afterwards or it is recreated by udev. The next open() call
>> can lead to creation of an inoperable MD device. The reason for
>> this is that a c
Hi,
I haven't been subscribed yet when I've sent my patch set.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=145563393627991&w=2
Please reply to the linux-raid mailing list if you'd like to comment my
patches.
Thanks,
Sebastian
___
systemd-devel mailing list
syste
On Mon, 15.02.16 21:32, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Am Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:28:19 +0100
> schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>
> > On Sun, 14.02.16 13:49, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I've followed the man page guide to setup mymachines name
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo