Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

16.04.2016 03:14, Reindl Harald пишет: > > > Am 15.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Xen: >> If you cannot give me a default mapping automatically, why not allow me >> to generate one easily? Is there a tool that can take the current device >> and produce the list I proposed? > > just use

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Am 15.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Xen: If you cannot give me a default mapping automatically, why not allow me to generate one easily? Is there a tool that can take the current device and produce the list I proposed? just use network.service aka /etc/init.d/network, enter the MAC and you are

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support

On 04/15/2016 10:47 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2016-04-15 19:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mack : >> On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> > I'm happy

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support

2016-04-15 19:33 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mack : > On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize it. I will

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Andrei Borzenkov schreef op 13-04-16 05:39: > Yes. And I do not see how all this information is expected to be stuffed > into 14 characters available for interface name, or even less if we > account to VLAN numbers. > > I am not aware of any OS that tries to do it. All of them maintain >

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Greg KH schreef op 13-04-16 05:04: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:42:29AM +0200, Xen wrote: >> When you say that probing on the PCI bus never ends, and if we are >> talking not about some form of hotplugging, then I really wonder what >> you're on about ;-) because I do think the kernel has a

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support

On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize it. I will need someone >>> to set me up with access to push the code, however.

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the >>> other side, the client

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Reindl Harald schreef op 15-04-16 18:06: > > > Am 15.04.2016 um 18:02 schrieb Xen: >> Reindl Harald schreef op 15-04-16 17:55: > so 3 seconds is unacceptable and the idea ist a joke in general > because > you wait for something possibly happen while you don't know how > long you

Re: [systemd-devel] on the default for, PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames

Reindl Harald schreef op 14-04-16 12:02: > > > Am 14.04.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Jetchko Jekov: >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:57 AM Reindl Harald > > can iterate over. >> > >> > $ ip -o a | awk '{print $2}' | uniq >> >> blub - gives a (incomplete) list of

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Am 15.04.2016 um 18:02 schrieb Xen: Reindl Harald schreef op 15-04-16 17:55: so 3 seconds is unacceptable and the idea ist a joke in general because you wait for something possibly happen while you don't know how long you have to wait and jsut hope for luck - that's not a good design and

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Reindl Harald schreef op 15-04-16 17:55: > > > Am 15.04.2016 um 17:48 schrieb Xen: >> Reindl Harald schreef op 13-04-16 10:24: >>> 4xHDD raid-10, hardware from 2011 >>> Startup finished in 660ms (kernel) + 5.380s (initrd) + 12.769s >>> (userspace) = 18.810s >>> >>> os on sd-card >>> Startup

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Am 15.04.2016 um 17:42 schrieb Xen: Greg KH schreef op 13-04-16 05:04: You are lying to me and trying to lead me in the woods. The stuff you say is stuff people say that in the end don't end up being true. It does not even agree with the reality of how the system works currently. They are

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Am 15.04.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Xen: Reindl Harald schreef op 13-04-16 10:26: What are you on about? Just because I don't have a superfast system, I cannot say anything? no beause of "hmm let wait 3 seconds for something we don't know if it ever appears and how long it would take to appear"

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Am 15.04.2016 um 17:48 schrieb Xen: Reindl Harald schreef op 13-04-16 10:24: 4xHDD raid-10, hardware from 2011 Startup finished in 660ms (kernel) + 5.380s (initrd) + 12.769s (userspace) = 18.810s os on sd-card Startup finished in 375ms (kernel) + 4.306s (initrd) + 8.323s (userspace) =

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Reindl Harald schreef op 13-04-16 10:26: > > > Am 13.04.2016 um 03:08 schrieb Xen: >> Reindl Harald schreef op 13-04-16 02:06: >>> >>> Am 13.04.2016 um 01:20 schrieb Xen: Greg KH schreef op 13-04-16 01:16: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:39:37AM +0200, Xen wrote: >> All you need to do

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Reindl Harald schreef op 13-04-16 10:24: > > > Am 13.04.2016 um 02:42 schrieb Xen: >> Greg KH schreef op 13-04-16 01:29: >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:20:05AM +0200, Xen wrote: >> >>> All execpt for 4-socket and larger servers. They take tens of minutes >>> in the BIOS and then less than a

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support

On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the >> other side, the client that talks to the initctl socket. I have patches >> to remove the initctl bits

Re: [systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS

Greg KH schreef op 13-04-16 05:04: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:42:29AM +0200, Xen wrote: >> When you say that probing on the PCI bus never ends, and if we are >> talking not about some form of hotplugging, then I really wonder what >> you're on about ;-) because I do think the kernel has a

Re: [systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support (was: Re: [RFC] the chopping block)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the > other side, the client that talks to the initctl socket. I have patches > to remove the initctl bits from the systemd repo, and add a callout from >

[systemd-devel] Factoring out initctl support (was: Re: [RFC] the chopping block)

Hi Mike, On 04/01/2016 10:11 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> The existing systemd-initctl (/dev/initctl) interface works quite >> nicely, so I will probably end up extracting it from systemd when you >> drop it, or just

Re: [systemd-devel] centos-ci

On 04/12/2016 01:52 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > Anyone know that centos is not running the latest version(s) of systemd > required for the upstream bug tracker so one has to ask what > notification spam is this > "Can one of the admins verify this patch?" Regarding that spam, I already

Re: [systemd-devel] some services always being killed when stress tests running

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:20:12PM +, Zizka, Jan (Nokia - CZ/Prague) wrote: > > From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On > > Behalf Of EXT Han Pingtian > > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 4:33 AM > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:13:54PM +0200, Lennart

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-boot in fedora 23/24

2016-04-14 20:02 GMT+03:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > It's there. It works. See bootctl(1). > > Zbyszek Thanks! Sorry for noise. -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru ___ systemd-devel mailing list