Hi,
when using zfs in combination with systemd, users run into the following
problem:
- zfs manages mountpoints on its own and systemd is not aware of those.
- this leads to problems, when mountpoints for other filesystems are mounted
on directories in a zfs dataset or files are created in a
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 08:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> normally service level agreemnets contain basic prerequisites and if the
> are ignored the customers has to pay a penalty in case of support cases
You live in a different world to me.
Just going to follow up with a blog I found on the
On 06/27/2016 02:36 PM, Chris Kühl wrote:
Workshops:
A new addition to this year's conference is the workshop day. The goal
of this day is to offer hands-on training sessions to those who want
to learn more about systemd. It's intended that these trainings be
conducted by systemd community
Hi List,
My company is currently conducting research into the most viable container
technology that fits our stack (CentOS based) and given our already
widespread reliance on systemd, I have a personal stake in preferring not
to introduce other tooling (LXD, the 2nd place leader) into our stack.
Hi all,
Here's a quick set of updates and reminders regarding systemd.conf 2016
Important dates:
We've got a number of important dates that are approaching for
systemd.conf 2016.
* June 30th: Early-bird ticket sales ends. Save yourself or your
organization 20% by purchasing early-bird bird
2016-06-27 13:49 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel
> wrote:
>> Dear systemd folks,
>>
>>
>> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
>> starting several services from it, is
Am 27.06.2016 um 08:30 schrieb Kai Hendry:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 01:03 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
(I also have a strong dislike for network admins who cling to their "HTTP
only" firewall policies... I don't see why NTP is a 'lesser' protocol
than
HTTP and DNS, both of which require either
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear systemd folks,
>
>
> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
> starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
> service unit require all services started from
Hi,
Thx for the answer.
>> Either way, +x has no meaning on sockets (only +w matters).
I guess this was the fact I was actually interested in.
Best regards
Marko Hoyer
Software Group II (ADITG/SW2)
Tel. +49 5121 49 6948
From: Mantas Mikulėnas [mailto:graw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Freitag, 24.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 01:03 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> Who would host the sync server? Or would you just point it at a random
> site
> and hope its operators don't mind? It's already bad enough that systemd
> defaults to Google's private NTP servers, IMHO.
Reminds me of the "Am I on the
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 10:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> are you aware that in case of many machines you should setp *one* ntpd
> and the other machines only acess this internal host to take away load
> from pool.ntp.org which would also solve the problem access port 123
> outside your network
Dear systemd folks,
having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
service unit require all services started from that template?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
12 matches
Mail list logo