On Friday 16 June 2017 01:06 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 15.06.17 18:22, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hmm, that wasn't the actual question though, was it? The point was just
to make networkd ignore carrier status (i.e. often there's no need to
remove addresses just because
On Fri, 16.06.17 11:06, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
> > Let's consider this case with delay:
> > After resume, gnome-setting-daemon queries SW_LID and got "close".
> > Then it lights up the wrong monitors.
> > Then I believe "open" will be delivered to it several seconds later.
> >
> On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:53, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
>> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
>> switch exported by ACPI
>>
>>> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv
Hi Lennart,
I tested this on Systemd v229 & observed this behavior.
Thanks,
RV
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 15.06.17 15:17, Renjith Vijayan (renjith...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > + Systemd-dev
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does journal ignore
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Benjamin
>
> Let me just say something one more time.
>
> > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
[snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > We can see:
> > > > > "logind" has already implemented a timeout, and will not respond lid
Hi, Benjamin
Let me just say something one more time.
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > From:
On Thu, 15.06.17 18:22, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hmm, that wasn't the actual question though, was it? The point was just
> > to make networkd ignore carrier status (i.e. often there's no need to
> > remove addresses just because the interface is down for a moment), not
> > to stop
On Fri, 09.06.17 10:23, Floris (jkflo...@dds.nl) wrote:
1;4602;0c
> I have an older ASUS R2E UMPC[1], which has a couple of media buttons. One
> button isn't recognized and print:
>
> asus_laptop: Unknown key 9a pressed
>
> I tried to add this button with an udev hwdb rule in
>
On Thu, 15.06.17 15:17, Renjith Vijayan (renjith...@gmail.com) wrote:
> + Systemd-dev
>
> Hi,
>
> Does journal ignore the forwarding of logs ending with newline(\n) to
> rsyslog? In my system there are some logs send directly via
> sd_journal_send() API and ending with newline.
> These logs are
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> > Hutterer
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > switch exported by ACPI
> >
> > On
10 matches
Mail list logo