Re: [systemd-devel] Persistent address on "Lost carrier"

2017-06-16 Thread Amish
On Friday 16 June 2017 01:06 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 15.06.17 18:22, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote: Hmm, that wasn't the actual question though, was it? The point was just to make networkd ignore carrier status (i.e. often there's no need to remove addresses just because

Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.06.17 11:06, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote: > > Let's consider this case with delay: > > After resume, gnome-setting-daemon queries SW_LID and got "close". > > Then it lights up the wrong monitors. > > Then I believe "open" will be delivered to it several seconds later. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
> On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:53, Zheng, Lv wrote: > > Hi, > >> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com] >> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID >> switch exported by ACPI >> >>> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv

Re: [systemd-devel] [rsyslog] Rsyslog & newlines

2017-06-16 Thread Renjith Vijayan
Hi Lennart, I tested this on Systemd v229 & observed this behavior. Thanks, RV On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 15.06.17 15:17, Renjith Vijayan (renjith...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > + Systemd-dev > > > > Hi, > > > > Does journal ignore

Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-16 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, Benjamin > > Let me just say something one more time. > > > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com] [snip] > > > > > > > > > > We can see: > > > > > "logind" has already implemented a timeout, and will not respond lid

Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-16 Thread Zheng, Lv
Hi, Benjamin Let me just say something one more time. > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com] > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch > exported by ACPI > > On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > From:

Re: [systemd-devel] Persistent address on "Lost carrier"

2017-06-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.06.17 18:22, Amish (anon.am...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hmm, that wasn't the actual question though, was it? The point was just > > to make networkd ignore carrier status (i.e. often there's no need to > > remove addresses just because the interface is down for a moment), not > > to stop

Re: [systemd-devel] udev hwdb add unknown button

2017-06-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 09.06.17 10:23, Floris (jkflo...@dds.nl) wrote: 1;4602;0c > I have an older ASUS R2E UMPC[1], which has a couple of media buttons. One > button isn't recognized and print: > > asus_laptop: Unknown key 9a pressed > > I tried to add this button with an udev hwdb rule in >

Re: [systemd-devel] [rsyslog] Rsyslog & newlines

2017-06-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.06.17 15:17, Renjith Vijayan (renjith...@gmail.com) wrote: > + Systemd-dev > > Hi, > > Does journal ignore the forwarding of logs ending with newline(\n) to > rsyslog? In my system there are some logs send directly via > sd_journal_send() API and ending with newline. > These logs are

Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-16 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, > > > From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org > > [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter > > Hutterer > > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID > > switch exported by ACPI > > > > On