Re: [systemd-devel] delayed reply to sd-bus method invocation

> machined has easier-to-follow uses of this, as it does some operations > that might take a bit longer, such as cloning or removing images. Thanks! Since I'll be going through this to come up with something for my own use case, it wouldn't be much to write up a self-contained example. Is there

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

On 06/28/2017 06:06 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: I think it was first packaged into systemd, and then it was split out to help those who want

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

Am 29.06.2017 um 11:51 schrieb Oliver Neukum: Am Donnerstag, den 29.06.2017, 11:45 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 29.06.2017 um 10:05 schrieb Oliver Neukum: Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: Well, it's a service manager. As such it keeps track of

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:51:53AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 29.06.2017, 11:45 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > > Am 29.06.2017 um 10:05 schrieb Oliver Neukum: > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > > > > > > > Well, it's a

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

Am 29.06.2017 um 10:05 schrieb Oliver Neukum: Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: Well, it's a service manager. As such it keeps track of services, knows when they are started and when they aren't. Why would it stop services that aren't started? Because you

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

Am Donnerstag, den 29.06.2017, 11:45 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > Am 29.06.2017 um 10:05 schrieb Oliver Neukum: > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > > > > > Well, it's a service manager. As such it keeps track of services, > > > knows when they

Re: [systemd-devel] delayed reply to sd-bus method invocation

On Wed, 28.06.17 20:52, Jason Litzinger (jlitzinger...@gmail.com) wrote: > I have a daemon using the sd-bus API with a use case that I suspect > is supported, but wanted to see if there was an example anywhere (I've > been looking, haven't found one yet). > > Is there a case in the systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

On Thu, 29.06.17 10:05, Oliver Neukum (oneu...@suse.com) wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > Well, it's a service manager. As such it keeps track of services, > > knows when they are started and when they aren't. Why would it stop > > services that

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > Well, it's a service manager. As such it keeps track of services, > > knows when they are started and when they aren't. Why would it stop > > services that

Re: [systemd-devel] 回复： 回复： [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop actually,whenservice is started by other way

Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > Well, it's a service manager. As such it keeps track of services, > knows when they are started and when they aren't. Why would it stop > services that aren't started? Because you command it to do so. The check systemd does