On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:54:09PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:34:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:35:16PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:49:54PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
>
Am 07.07.2017 um 21:55 schrieb Kai Krakow:
Am Tue, 4 Jul 2017 21:23:01 + (UTC)
schrieb Alexander Bisogiannis :
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:21:01 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
If you need root permissions to create a unit, then it's not a
security issue. An
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
[...]
The bug here is that a leading number will "convert" to the number and
it actually runs with the UID specified that way: 0day = 0, 7days = 7.
No, this is not the case. Only all-digit User= values are treated as UIDs.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:34:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:35:16PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:49:54PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:37:08PM +, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:35:16PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:49:54PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:37:08PM +, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > > Back when that commit was made, didn't glibc cache the getpid() result in
> > >
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:49:54PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:37:08PM +, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > Back when that commit was made, didn't glibc cache the getpid() result in
> > userspace? That would explain why it was not noticed.
>
> Hmm, this crossed my
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:49:54PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:37:08PM +, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > Back when that commit was made, didn't glibc cache the getpid() result in
> > userspace? That would explain why it was not noticed.
>
> Hmm, this crossed my
Back when that commit was made, didn't glibc cache the getpid() result in
userspace? That would explain why it was not noticed.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017, 23:18 wrote:
> In doing some casual journalctl profiling and stracing, it became apparent
> that `journalctl -b --no-pager`
Hmm, this crossed my mind, and come to think of it I did a dist-upgrade
from Debian jessie to stretch overnight machine and haven't rebooted.
Perhaps the vdso isn't working and the costly getpid() is a red herring, will
reboot and retest to confirm.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:37:08PM +,
In doing some casual journalctl profiling and stracing, it became apparent
that `journalctl -b --no-pager` runs across a significant quantity of logs,
~10% of the time was thrown away on getpid() calls due to commmit a65f06b.
As-is:
# time ./journalctl -b --no-pager > /dev/null
real
Am Tue, 4 Jul 2017 21:23:01 + (UTC)
schrieb Alexander Bisogiannis :
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:21:01 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > If you need root permissions to create a unit, then it's not a
> > security issue. An annoyance at most.
>
> The fact that
Hello, everyone!
06.07.2017 19:17, Mikhail Kasimov пишет:
>
> 06.07.2017 19:12, Mikhail Kasimov пишет:
>> 06.07.2017 18:27, Michael Chapman пишет:
>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
06.07.2017 17:18, Michael Chapman пишет:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo