Am 08.07.2017 um 08:29 schrieb Michael Chapman:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
Am Sat, 8 Jul 2017 08:05:44 +0200
schrieb Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com>:
Am Sat, 8 Jul 2017 11:39:02 +1000 (AEST)
schrieb Michael Chapman <m...@very.puzzling.org>:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
[...]
The bug here is that a leading number will "convert" to the number
and it actually runs with the UID specified that way: 0day = 0,
7days = 7.
No, this is not the case. Only all-digit User= values are treated
as
Then behavior is "correct".
Or in other words: The original bug description is wrong. The bug isn't
with non-existent users. That works fine.
That is correct.
There's a lot of misinformation floating around with this issue --
there's a tendency amongst some parts of the Linux community to jump on
the systemd-bashing bandwagon without fully understanding the problems.
The best thing we can do to counter this is to ascertain the facts,
decide what if anything needs to be fixed, and discuss the best way to
move forward with that
why in the world do you not read the bugreport itself?
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237
the decription is *not* about non-existent users so top spread FUD about
"systemd-bashing bandwagon without fully understanding the problems"
when you even don't read the bugreport you are talking about
_________________________________
how does that sound like talking about non-existing users?
I searched google and found that it was not right to named a linux user
with 0day, it should satisfy "^[a-z][-a-z0-9]*\$ , but when I use xinted
to start the service, it can handle the previlege rightly with linux
user 0day
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
