What would a patch look like? A --user that instead saves it to the user's
active secret service?
--
Ryan (ライアン)
Yoko Shimomura, ryo (supercell/EGOIST), Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone else
https://refi64.com/
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 9:44 AM Lennart Poettering On Mi, 14.11.18 11:38, Sietse van Zanen
On Mi, 14.11.18 11:38, Sietse van Zanen (sie...@wizdom.nu) wrote:
> According to man:
>
>--keyname=
>Configure a kernel keyring key name to use as cache for the
> password. If set, then the tool will try to push any collected passwords into
> the
>kernel keyring
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:43 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I mean, seriously, people do lots of stuff. It doesn't mean that all
> what people do is actually a good idea or just safe.
>
Certainly agreed on this point. It is my belief, however, that system
software, where possible, should
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:15:18 +0100
> From: Piotr Dobrogost
> Message-ID: <
caa6tfmuar3vnz3bap6fpdjbftutk3gdfkmch_cr7d+by1yj...@mail.gmail.com>
> I enabled unified hierarchy by passing "systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy"
> kernel parameter and stat reports "cgroups2fs" yet the limit still
According to man:
--keyname=
Configure a kernel keyring key name to use as cache for the
password. If set, then the tool will try to push any collected passwords into
the
kernel keyring of the root user
Why only for user root and not the user running
juice kirjoitti 2018-11-06 14:30:
Lennart Poettering kirjoitti 2018-11-06 12:27:
On Di, 06.11.18 11:57, juice (ju...@swagman.org) wrote:
Hi,
During the past half year I have seen systemd dump core three times
due
to what I suspect a hashmap corruption or race.
Each time it looks a bit
On Mi, 14.11.18 02:17, Marek Howard (marek...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > It is not *that* common to pass secrets via environment variable but
> > it's nothing unusual, and many programs offer this interface. OpenVPN
> > comes to bind. Where such interface is offered, propagating down the
> > process
