Re: [systemd-devel] RFC: support ethtool pause setting in systemd.link

2019-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 17.10.19 10:23, Stephen Hemminger (step...@networkplumber.org) wrote: > Ethernet flow control (pause) is a setting which often is best disabled. > Systemd has nice way to configure other link settings like WoL, TSO, etc > but doesn't have a way to configure pause. > > It would be good to

[systemd-devel] RFC: support ethtool pause setting in systemd.link

2019-10-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Ethernet flow control (pause) is a setting which often is best disabled. Systemd has nice way to configure other link settings like WoL, TSO, etc but doesn't have a way to configure pause. It would be good to have something like: [Match] Driver=ixgbe [Link] Pause=off Possible values should

Re: [systemd-devel] DHCP Server on multiple interfaces

2019-10-17 Thread Martin Townsend
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:55 PM Martin Townsend wrote: > > Hi, > > Does systemd support the networkd DHCP Server on multiple network > interfaces. I ask as we have an embedded system running systemd 239 > and we want to configure a DHCP server on a bluetooth PAN and one of > the Ethernet

Re: [systemd-devel] DHCP Server on multiple interfaces

2019-10-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.10.19 um 17:55 schrieb Martin Townsend: > Does systemd support the networkd DHCP Server on multiple network > interfaces. I ask as we have an embedded system running systemd 239 > and we want to configure a DHCP server on a bluetooth PAN and one of > the Ethernet interfaces both of which

[systemd-devel] DHCP Server on multiple interfaces

2019-10-17 Thread Martin Townsend
Hi, Does systemd support the networkd DHCP Server on multiple network interfaces. I ask as we have an embedded system running systemd 239 and we want to configure a DHCP server on a bluetooth PAN and one of the Ethernet interfaces both of which are used for configuring the device. I've set up

[systemd-devel] How-to for systemd user timers instead of cron/crontab?

2019-10-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear systemd folks, I couldn’t find a simple documentation for “normal” users how to use systemd timers instead of cron/crontab? The Arch Wiki has a page [1], but I am afraid it’s still too complicated for our users. Kind regards, Paul [1]:

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Mutually exclusive (timer-triggered) services

2019-10-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.10.19 um 08:02 schrieb Ulrich Windl: >> Or did I miss something and the second flock somehow obtains the inode >> number of the old lock? > > I guess any new process arriving late cannot aquire the (same) lock once the > first process has removed the name when the crowd has finished. >

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Mutually exclusive (timer-triggered) services

2019-10-17 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Alexander Koch schrieb am 16.10.2019 um 16:14 in Nachricht <9fb9c1a157e92baef1107ed3b66aa...@alexanderkoch.net>: > * flock leaves the lock file behind so you'd need some type of > cleanup in case you really want the jobs to be trace‑free. This is > not as trivial is it might seem,