Re: [systemd-devel] The meaning of CanMultiSession=no on non-seat0

2020-04-02 Thread nerdopolis
On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:59:30 AM EDT Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 28.01.20 22:48, nerdopolis (bluescreen_aven...@verizon.net) wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Sorry if this is the wrong place for this. I can't seem to find a > > system-user > > mailing list for this purpose on freedesktop. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Creating a roaming USB home area using homectl

2020-04-02 Thread Matthew Wardrop
Thanks for your response, Lennart! I've created the requisite public keys to /var/lib/systemd/home; but things still aren't working. Based on issue https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15178 am I correct in understanding that the key revocation warning also covers instances where the

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-networkd override hostname not being sent to DHCP

2020-04-02 Thread Andy Pieters
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 15:32, Susant Sahani wrote: > > Itshould be like this > > [DHCPv4] > > SendHostname=true > > Hostname=myhostname > Thank you Susant that's what it was :) ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-networkd override hostname not being sent to DHCP

2020-04-02 Thread Susant Sahani
Itshould be like this [DHCPv4] SendHostname=true Hostname=myhostname Susant From: systemd-devel Date: Thursday, 2 April 2020 at 6:18 PM To: systemd Mailing List Subject: [systemd-devel] systemd-networkd override hostname not being sent to DHCP Hi I have a network file like this: ---

Re: [systemd-devel] Grouping services in systemd..

2020-04-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.04.20 18:51, nitish nagesh (nagesh.nit...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi folks, > > We are working on an embedded ARM Cortex A9 based system (aka low CPU). > It runs on a custom linux based operating system which uses systemd. > > We have a bunch of daemons (around ~50+) that come up during

Re: [systemd-devel] Grouping services in systemd..

2020-04-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.04.20 um 15:21 schrieb nitish nagesh: >   We are working on an embedded ARM Cortex A9 based system (aka low > CPU). It runs on a custom linux based operating system which uses systemd. > >   We have a bunch of daemons (around ~50+) that come up during boot > simultaneously which slows down

[systemd-devel] Grouping services in systemd..

2020-04-02 Thread nitish nagesh
Hi folks, We are working on an embedded ARM Cortex A9 based system (aka low CPU). It runs on a custom linux based operating system which uses systemd. We have a bunch of daemons (around ~50+) that come up during boot simultaneously which slows down the boot significantly as the CPU runs out

[systemd-devel] systemd-networkd override hostname not being sent to DHCP

2020-04-02 Thread Andy Pieters
Hi I have a network file like this: --- [Match] Name=enp2s0 [Network] DHCP=ipv4 Domains=faster rstore Hostname=myhostname SendHostname=True After saving the file, doing a systemctl daemon-reload and a systemdctl restart systemd-networkd it would seem that this is still not being applied.

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Lennart, Am 01.04.20 um 17:10 schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Mi, 01.04.20 14:23, Paul Menzel (pmenzel+systemd-de...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote: After=device should work. udev announces device after all rules have been processed. After= only orders, but this doesn't pull the device unit into

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.04.20 11:30, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Thinking about this: it might make sense to revisit this > > eventually... for example maybe instead of having gdm run all the time > > and just listening to SeatAdded/SeatRemoved and CanGraphical property > > changes and then

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:08:06 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 02.04.20 10:35, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > I don't think you need to wait for CanGraphical. I mean, the value of > > > that field just reflects whether at least one DRM or other graphical > > > device

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 02.04.20 10:35, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > I don't think you need to wait for CanGraphical. I mean, the value of > > that field just reflects whether at least one DRM or other graphical > > device was discovered associated with the seat. > > Hi, > > what other

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:35:49 +0300 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:09:59 +0200 > Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Mi, 01.04.20 11:34, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > > Is there a way to order a service in such a way, that it’s guaranteed > > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering after udev applied rules to `/dev/dri/card0`

2020-04-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:09:59 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mi, 01.04.20 11:34, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to order a service in such a way, that it’s guaranteed > > > > that > > > > udev rules to devices were applied? > > > > > > > > A small