On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:14 -0400, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:16 +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:14 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > While we're at it, I'd like to mention another issue: WWID
> > > > changes.
> > > >
> > > > This
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 20:33 +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:14 -0400, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> >
> > There's no way to do that, in principle. Because there could be
> > other I/Os in flight. You might (somehow) avoid retrying an I/O
> > that got a UA until you figured out if
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:16 +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:14 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > While we're at it, I'd like to mention another issue: WWID
> > > changes.
> > >
> > > This is a big problem for multipathd. The gist is that the device
> > >
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 12:52 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > > Hannes Reinecke schrieb am 27.04.2021 um 10:21
> > > > in Nachricht
>
> <2a6903e4-ff2b-67d5-e772-6971db844...@suse.de>:
> > On 4/27/21 10:10 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021‑04‑27 at 13:48 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote:
> >
Hi all,
In case anybody is interested.
After some heavy debugging I was able to bisect the issue to the following
pull request (which was backported to v247)
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18802#issuecomment-827707662 . I
left comments there on what broke.
Thanks for the help either
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 13:48 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote:
> >
> > Wrt 1), we can only hope that it's the case. But 2) and 3) need work,
> > afaics.
> >
> In my view the WWID should never change.
In an ideal world, perhaps not. But in the dm-multipath realm, we know
that WWID changes can
>>> Hannes Reinecke schrieb am 27.04.2021 um 10:21 in Nachricht
<2a6903e4-ff2b-67d5-e772-6971db844...@suse.de>:
> On 4/27/21 10:10 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:
>> On Tue, 2021‑04‑27 at 13:48 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote:
Wrt 1), we can only hope that it's the case. But 2) and 3) need work,
On 4/27/21 10:10 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 13:48 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote:
>>>
>>> Wrt 1), we can only hope that it's the case. But 2) and 3) need work,
>>> afaics.
>>>
>> In my view the WWID should never change.
>
> In an ideal world, perhaps not. But in the
>>> Erwin van Londen schrieb am 27.04.2021 um 05:48
>>> in
Nachricht
:
>
> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:16 +, Martin Wilck wrote:
>> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:14 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > While we're at it, I'd like to mention another issue: WWID
>> > > changes.
>> > >
