Greetings,
I believe the Debian package of mpd enables a --global .service and
.socket unit for the mpd daemon/service.
I'd like to mask that and install it just to a single --user service.
I've tried that:
sudo systemctl --global mask mpd.service
sudo systemctl --global mask mpd.socket
and th
--On Friday, September 17, 2021 12:49 PM +0200 Lennart Poettering
wrote:
more specific example: you can use apache without mysql, and you can
use mysql without apache, but quite often they are used together, and
if so you likely want to start mysql first, and apache second, since
it likely con
Hi! Thanks for the reply.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:57 PM Michael Chapman wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I believe the Debian package of mpd enables a --global .service and
> > .socket unit for the mpd daemon/service.
> >
> > I'd like to mask that an
On Sat, 18 Sep 2021, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I believe the Debian package of mpd enables a --global .service and
> .socket unit for the mpd daemon/service.
>
> I'd like to mask that and install it just to a single --user service.
Why do you need to mask the socket and service at
Hi guys.
I'm trying to have unit to start...
well,
I have a luks device which waits for manual passphrase
input, when that happens 'systemd' mounts, without user
intervention(which is great), that luks device.
fstab:
/dev/mapper/luks.devs /devs ext4
noatime,nobarrier,noatime,x-systemd.devic
Hi,
I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot
sequence:
U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel
Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf from U-boot.
(More choice, easier to write config, runtime kernel change).
So far "kernel" and "initramfs" k
On 2021/9/17 19:45, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fr, 17.09.21 19:25, Qu Wenruo (w...@suse.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot
sequence:
U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel
Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf f
On 2021/9/17 19:45, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fr, 17.09.21 19:25, Qu Wenruo (w...@suse.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot
sequence:
U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel
Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf f
On Fr, 17.09.21 19:25, Qu Wenruo (w...@suse.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot
> sequence:
>
> U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel
>
> Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf from U-boot.
> (More choice, easier to w
On Mi, 15.09.21 17:15, Manuel Wagesreither (man...@fastmail.fm) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm onboarding some collegues who don't have much experience with
> systemd. One thing I would like to focus on is the difference
> between Before=/After= and Wants=/Requires=/BindsTo in systemd
> units.
>
> I
Hello Manuel,
my experience is that it is helpful for people new to systemd to "raise the
right question" that is answered by the corresponding relationship between
systemd units.
The question "*if* a unit shall be started/enqueued" is answered
Wants=/Requires=/BindsTo relation. I call this th
11 matches
Mail list logo
