Hi, some days ago we were talking about this:
> > Problem number two, there's a significant delay since when creating the
> > scope, until it is ready and the pid attached into it. The only way it
> > worked was to put a 'sleep' after the dbus call and make my process wait
> > for the async call
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 22:26:15 +0100
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am Mi., 23. März 2022 um 22:11 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> :
>
> > Or in other words: I'd prefer for such people to speak up for
> > themselves, rather than us trying to figure out what somebody else
> > *might* be planning
Am Mi., 23. März 2022 um 22:11 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
:
> Or in other words: I'd prefer for such people to speak up for
> themselves, rather than us trying to figure out what somebody else
> *might* be planning to do.
That's laudable but keep in mind that users typically don't
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:58:22PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 12:38 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:28:29AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at
Hello,
Il giorno mer 23 mar 2022 alle ore 13:56 Lennart Poettering <
lenn...@poettering.net> ha scritto:
> > Also sadly IMAGE_VERSION doesn't allow + which is used from semver for
> > build metadata (such as 1.0.0+21AF26D3 or 1.0.0+20130313144700).
>
> Ah, interesting. This looks like something
On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 12:38 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:28:29AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:26:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM
On Mi, 23.03.22 13:38, Davide Bettio (davide.bet...@secomind.com) wrote:
> > That's the idea: take the packages, build an image, and then append
> > IMAGE_ID/IMAGE_VERSION to it?
>
> Sure, sounds pretty convenient, here my point was about blindly appending
> those additional fields (trusting the
Hello,
Il giorno mer 23 mar 2022 alle ore 11:32 Lennart Poettering <
lenn...@poettering.net> ha scritto:
> On Mi, 23.03.22 10:51, Davide Bettio (davide.bet...@secomind.com) wrote:
>
> Well, if the distribution people build both packages and disk images,
> they can set IMAGE_ID/IMAGE_VERSION for
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:28:29AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:26:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:26:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 22,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:26:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi
On Mi, 23.03.22 10:51, Davide Bettio (davide.bet...@secomind.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all, thanks for your answers.
>
> It wasn't really clear to me that the /etc/os-release file was editable
> from a 3rd party other than the distribution maintainers, so thanks for the
> clarifications.
Hello,
First of all, thanks for your answers.
It wasn't really clear to me that the /etc/os-release file was editable
from a 3rd party other than the distribution maintainers, so thanks for the
clarifications. Are the distributions required to leave IMAGE_ID and
IMAGE_VERSION empty? Can I safely
Hi!
It's not documented, but "journalctl -g ..." seems to exit with success when
the pattern was found, and with 1 when it was not.
Can I rely on that?
The other thing is when grepping across reboots, the "-- Reboot --" is always
output, even if it does not match the pattern. Is that a bug or
On Mi, 23.03.22 14:25, 吾为男子 (csren...@qq.com) wrote:
> dear all experts,
>
> now we have such a problem:
>
> we need to update our systemd service configuration file,
>
> before updating, our service has already created some processes and
> make them attach to cgroup
>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we are considering dropping upstream support for
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we are considering dropping upstream support for kernel versions < 4.4.
> > Would this be a problem for anyone? (*).
>
> Given that upstream
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are considering dropping upstream support for kernel versions < 4.4.
> Would this be a problem for anyone? (*).
Given that upstream (i.e. kernel.org) has dropped support for kernel
4.4, why not just
18 matches
Mail list logo
