On 17.01.2023 18:28, Thomas Burghout wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to configure a device to use a gateway and a static IP address
(in the link-local address range). However, the default gateway does not appear
to be used. As such, there is no traffic possible to the internet.
The device runs
There's no single service option to do this, as far as I know, since it
involves a bit more than just making the interface visible.
After PrivateNetwork is enabled, the newly created namespaces need to be
explicitly given network access through the host; the same "external"
interface can't exist
I am on current main branch:
0eb635ef4bc1 (HEAD -> main, origin/main, origin/HEAD) units: don't install
pcrphase-related units without gnu-efi
And I cannot get the mkosi qemu to work, mkosi boot does work. It looks like
it's not finding the relevant section to boot
from the image:
Unable to
I am working on a service unit for a DHT crawler.
For some reason, it doesn't work well with the default network settings
because it seems to use a huge amount of traffic for a very small
amount of findings.
The same program works fine via docker, but I want to package it as a
hardened systemd
Hello,
We are trying to configure a device to use a gateway and a static IP address
(in the link-local address range). However, the default gateway does not appear
to be used. As such, there is no traffic possible to the internet.
The device runs systemd 251.4 on a custom Yocto distribution
Hello,
That seems to work, thank you.
W dniu 17.01.2023 o 13:05, Michał Zegan pisze:
It is a fedora system with a custom build kernel. As for why, probably
the only answer is that it is because i am weird, it is a laptop also
used as my personal playground.
When it goes to initrd, it might
It is a fedora system with a custom build kernel. As for why, probably
the only answer is that it is because i am weird, it is a laptop also
used as my personal playground.
When it goes to initrd, it might be it's not in initrd, in which case
that could explain it. Can see.
W dniu
On Mo, 16.01.23 21:30, Michał Zegan (webc...@outlook.com) wrote:
> At quick glance i cannot find anything about it. what about kernel
> configuration? efivarfs is compiled as a module. is there any possible thing
> that might happen here?
Ah, so this is not a fedora system as you claim? fedora
