On 19.01.2024 20:22, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 19:12 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows...
we've
had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated
fTPM
On 19.01.2024 19:47, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows... we've
had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated fTPM
but it wasn't even mentioned until we did a BIOS update, e
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 19:12 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> > In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows...
> we've
> > had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated
> fTPM
> > but it wasn't even mentioned unti
On 2024-01-19 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> I shall try to upgrade the bios to the latest version and see
> if something shows up.
The bios was already the latest version.
On 2024-01-19 Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> In general I've learned to not quite trust what the firmware shows... we've
> had a batch of Skylake-or-so desktops that *did* have a CPU-integrated fTPM
> but it wasn't even mentioned until we did a BIOS update, even though CPU
> spec said it should be pres
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 17:47 Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Do, 18.01.24 22:53, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> ~/ % systemd-creds has-tpm2
> >> partial
> >> +firmware
> >> -driver
> >> +system
> >> +subsystem
> >> +libraries
On 2024-01-18 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 18.01.24 22:53, Morten Bo Johansen (morte...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
>> ~/ % systemd-creds has-tpm2
>> partial
>> +firmware
>> -driver
>> +system
>> +subsystem
>> +libraries
>
> OK, so this indicates that your system has TPM support on all levels
> wi
Le 20/12/2023 à 14:30, Belanger, Martin a écrit :
Hi,
On one of my servers, I use avahi to realize mDNS resolution. With avahi I am
able to choose on which ip version I want avahi to answer to mdns requests
(ipv4 or ipv6). In my opinion, this is convenient on local networks with both
stacks, esp
On Do, 18.01.24 23:40, Nils Kattenbeck (nilskem...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > They are turning up as failed units, so they are being run,
> > > even if I don't have any TPM module. Also, I have a notifier in
> > > my waybar telling me of failed services and I don't want to see
> > > them there.
> >
>
