Re: [systemd-devel] sd-varlink and socket activation?

2025-01-08 Thread Nils Kattenbeck
Hi, do you set Accept=yes in your socket unit? I think ask-password.c and hostnamed.c might be some pretty barebones services to which you may compare your code - the former uses Accept=yes and the latter does not. If you do not use Accept=yes but terminate as soon as the only connection leaves i

[systemd-devel] sd-varlink and socket activation?

2025-01-08 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
) Hi, While sd-varlink works fine for me with always running daemons, I have a bigger problem with socket activation. So having "wtmpdbd.socket" and "wtmpdbd.service". If a tool connects to the socket, the daemon gets started, answers the query and after the last connection is closed, quits. But

Re: [systemd-devel] Dynamic link-local address not assigned after collision

2025-01-08 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
08.01.2025 01:38, Muggeridge, Matt wrote: It behaves this way when using IPv4LLStartAddress. If the address is in use, it chooses another from the 169.254/16 range. OK, I missed this option. ... What could be done is supporting something like Address=169.254.4.0/24 with the semantic "pic