On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 09:30 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Ian Kent wrote on 29/07/2020 01:57:
> > On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 16:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mo, 27.07.20 12:57, Ian Kent (ik...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Further to
On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 11:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 29.07.20 08:57, Ian Kent (ik...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 16:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mo, 27.07.20 12:57, Ian Kent (ik...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
> >
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 16:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 27.07.20 12:57, Ian Kent (ik...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Further to my post about using the new mount table notifications in
> > systemd I'd like to start by posting a few patches for discussion
>
From: Ian Kent
When kernelwatch notification handling is added it will be necessary
to find the Mount unit from the mount id to update individual Mount
state.
Add a Hashmap to lookup the Unit to get the Mount given a MountParameters
mount id.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
src/core/mount.c
From: Ian Kent
When kernelwatch notification handling is added it will be necessary
to find the Mount unit from the mount id to update individual Mount
state, so add the mount id to MountParameters.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
src/core/mount.c | 29 +
src/core
From: Ian Kent
Try and use the new fsinfo() system call when handing SIGCHLD from
systemd mount unit mounting.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
src/core/mount.c | 52 +++-
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core
From: Ian Kent
Introduce an initial implementation that uses the new libmount
kernelwatch notification method together with the fsinfo() system
call.
What I'm trying to do here is use kernelwatch notifications to create
a set of mount units that have actually changed for the traversal
From: Ian Kent
When libmount kernelwatch notifications are introduced it will be
necessary to update mount unit state for individual units when so
seperate out the state update.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
src/core/mount.c | 154 --
1 file
From: Ian Kent
Try and use the new fsinfo() system call when loading the mount table
if possible.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
---
src/core/mount.c |6 --
src/mount/mount-tool.c |4 +++-
src/shared/libmount-util.h | 28
src/shared/mount
.
Comments on what I have so far are welcome. And also any discussion
about how the mount unit state update works would be much appreciated,
as well as approaches to debugging sysyemd problems in general.
---
Ian Kent (6):
systemd: try to use libmount fsinfo if available
systemd: ref
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 08:47 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 10:44 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Some of you may be aware of the David Howells recent efforts to
> > have
> > a new notifications sub-system merged into the upstr
Hi all,
Some of you may be aware of the David Howells recent efforts to have
a new notifications sub-system merged into the upstream kernel.
Part of that includes a way to get information about specific mounts
without loading and scanning the mount table (the new fsinfo() system
call).
Paired wi
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 17:37 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > Typically this is done by breaking the proposed change into smaller atomic
> > patches. Is that not possible in this case?
>
> Not entire
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 03:08 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:38, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:33 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 14:26, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:58, Le
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 13:23 +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 11.11.2011, 14:33 +0100 schrieb Kay Sievers:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 14:26, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:58, Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
> > >&g
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:33 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 14:26, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:58, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20.09.11 11:36, Ian Kent (ra...@themaw.net) wrote:
> >>
> >>> &g
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 22:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 16.09.11 14:09, Thomas Meyer (tho...@m3y3r.de) wrote:
>
> > the size of autofs_v5_packet_union is 300 bytes on x86 and 304 bytes on
> > x86_64 kernels.
> > when running systemd (x86) on an x86_64 kernel this leads to a hang in
17 matches
Mail list logo
