Brilliant, worked like a charm :
$ ls -l /dev/snd/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 rootroot 60 11 janv. 00:52 by-id
drwxr-xr-x 2 rootroot 100 11 janv. 00:52 by-path
crw-rw+ 1 rootaudio 116, 2 11 janv. 00:52 controlC0
crw-rw+ 1 rootaudio 116, 7 11 janv. 00:52 controlC1
c
ti", TAG:=""
(the doc says that the := operator forbid any subsequent overriding of
the variable, and my rule file is ordered early starting with 01-) but
my soundcard devices still have ACL.
Now I don't know what else to do or what mechanism is actually setting
t
d at this yet, but I
couldn't find any interesting thread about this issue. I hope it's not me
being bad at googling.
Regards,
Léo Gillot-Lamure.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Aaaah, crap, that was it : too old gummiboot, I think I was using
version 7 or 10...
Now (I've stolen a binary from f19 package because I couldn't build
it) it works and I've even got firmware time information in
systemd-analyze (a 30s spent in firmware…).
Thanks for the help and the good job
Yup, I have both.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
My module is built in the kernel (actually modules support is disabled
on my kernel), and the /sys/firmware/efi/ is here and properly usable
(for example efibootmgr works).
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
LoaderDevicePartUUID variable.
Is my firmware buggy ? Could the generator be modified to work anyway ?
Thanks.
Léo Gillot-Lamure.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
devices/pci:00/:00:1f.2/ata2/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/delete".
The goal is reducing noise.
It would be nice to bind these commands in the device unit itself so
that other units needing it can start it by themselves, etc.
Thanks,
Léo Gillot-Lamure.
_
appears with pulseaudio (launched by
gnome-settings-daemon aswell) and virtually any bus-activated user
service that you'd like to be a service managed by systemd instead of
dbus-daemon.
Regards,
Léo Gillot-Lamure.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
it, but it doesn't change anything.
Have you guys using the user session noticed the same thing ?
Regards,
Léo Gillot-Lamure.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Simple suggestion : GDM takes a name on the bus, so you can reliably
know when the service has finished to start. The service file used in
Gentoo adds a line "BusName=org.gnome.DisplayManager" in the [Service]
section to achieve that.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
ixed ? Maybe there are already
patches around fixing it ? I could not see any mention of it on the
mailing list.
Thanks,
Léo Gillot-Lamure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-de
#x27;d be happy, though, if the systemd devs prove me wrong.
Léo Gillot-Lamure
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
