On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:21:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 28.06.17 09:06, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering
> > <mzxre...@0pointer.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28.06
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering
<mzxre...@0pointer.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote:
>
>> > Do you know how systemd developers feel about the issue (CCed)? Given
>> > that it seems to domina
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:25:53PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:39:42 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is that advanced NICs are quite programmable [1] and
> > > depending on use case one may want to load different firmware
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:12:37AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Making kmod a special case is of course possible. However, as long
now.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:12:37AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
commit e64fae5573e566ce4fd9b23c68ac8f3096603314
Author: Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org
Date: Wed Jan 18 05:06:18 2012 +0100
udevd: kill
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
How about simply introducing a new flag to finit_module() to indicate
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 11.08.14 18:39, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
More than two years
have gone by on growing design and assumptions on top of that original
commit. I'm not sure if *systemd folks* yet believe
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
and added a warning
which is triggered after a third of the timeout.
This is great! What commit merged this?I just looked at the latest
commits
Tom, thanks for reviewing this! My reply below!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:16 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:38 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
If we want to sort out some sync/async
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:07:10PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Hey, if you have patches already, I'll be glad to look at them :)
OK well I'll spin what I have then, but I'm reviewing Wu's solution
from
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 11.08.14 18:39, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
This looks really wrong. We shouldn't permit worker processes
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
When Christian tried removing the udev firmware loader
it was detected that the Dell rbu driver still required
use of FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER [0]. This driver needed
reworking to not be tied to the firmware loader, curious
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:42:49AM -0700, Casey Leedom wrote:
On 08/13/2014 04:33 PM, Anish Bhatt wrote:
Adding Casey who's actually incharge of this code and missing from the CC
list
Thanks Anish!
As I mentioned to Anish, there are fundamentally two problems here in the
time being
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:42:49AM -0700, Casey Leedom wrote:
Part of the problem is that the current
architecture has Device Probe happening out of the Module Initialization
when we call pci_register_driver() with our
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:50:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 08.08.14 19:16, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@do-not-panic.com) wrote:
This looks really wrong. We shouldn't permit worker processes to be
blocked indefinitely without any timeout applied. Designing a worker
process
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 11.08.14 18:39, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
This looks really wrong. We shouldn't permit worker processes to be
blocked indefinitely without any timeout applied. Designing a worker
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was
to introduce a timeout send to hell drivers that are not using
asynch firmware loading
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was
to introduce a timeout for drivers that are not using asynch
firmware loading. That commit actually would not have triggered
in full effect on udev's usage of kmod for module loading until
commit
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was
to introduce a timeout send to hell drivers that are not using
asynch firmware loading. That commit actually would not have
triggered in full effect on udev's usage of kmod for module
loading
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:19:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.06.14 18:04, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@do-not-panic.com) wrote:
Hey folks,
so I've been working on getting systemd support on xen for a bit now
and thanks to the last suggestion about the launcher here
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:24:44PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:19:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.06.14 18:04, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@do-not-panic.com) wrote
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
El 12/06/14 21:04, Luis R. Rodriguez escribió:
- If you want to use the dynamic link loader you should use
AX_AVAILABLE_SYSTEMD() but must then ensure to use -rdynamic -ldl
when linking
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
El 25/06/14 13:00, Luis R. Rodriguez escribió:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
El 12/06/14 21:04, Luis R. Rodriguez escribió:
- If you want to use
Hey folks,
so I've been working on getting systemd support on xen for a bit now
and thanks to the last suggestion about the launcher here on
systemd-devel I think we're on the final stretch now. I'll be
submitting a v6 PATCH series shortly which I think should be the last
if not close to the last
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
I'm cc'ing a few
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives
Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 01:20 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 01:02 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
It might be reasonable for hotplugpath.sh to define
XENSTORE_xenstored=/path/to/xenstored
Hey folks,
Xen systemd support with active sockets and sd_notify() is under way,
we're in what seems to be the final rounds of patch review. One of the
last items we are reviewing is how to best deal with a deamon that has
two binary options for the daemon. They share the same arguments and
in
31 matches
Mail list logo
