ay we also preserve
symmetry, because seek_cursor accepts a string.
I'm pushing a patch adding an entry to converters.
Zbyszek
Thanks Zbyszek. Also, thanks for adding the version numbers :)
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
sys
On 14/04/13 20:55, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
def get_next(self, skip=1):
-"""Return the next log entry as a dictionary of fields.
+"""Return the next log entry as a mapping type, currently
+a standard dictionary of fields.
Optio
On 30/04/13 03:33, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:11:03PM +0100, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
From: Steven Hiscocks
---
Hi,
I thought it would be useful to have a version number in the python systemd
module.
Hi,
I haven't replied to this before because o
MESSAGE_ID=mid,
PRIORITY=format(pri),
@@ -516,7 +529,7 @@ class JournalHandler(_logging.Handler):
CODE_FILE=record.pathname,
CODE_LINE=record.lineno,
CODE_FUNC=record.funcName,
-
From: Steven Hiscocks
---
Hi,
I thought it would be useful to have a version number in the python systemd
module.
I'm not overly familiar with Make, etc. but hopefully I've taken the right
approach. :)
Thanks
Steven Hiscocks
Makefile.am|
On 22/04/13 22:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:53:55PM +0100, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
+self._SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER = (_sys.argv[0]
+ if SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER is None
THREAD_NAME=record.threadName,
How about having the value as `__name__`, but`_sys.argv[0]` if `__name__
== "__main__`?
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
and `get_previous` does on the traversal and getting of both
special and standard fields to simplify use of the Reader.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 14/04/13 03:36, David Strauss wrote:
I
Otherwise looks good to me :)
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
From: Steven Hiscocks
Changes to _Reader make it match closer to C API, by removing `get_next`
and `get_previous`. A `get_all` method added, which returns dictionary
of fields using C API SD_JOURNAL_FOREACH_DATA macro, which can be used
in conjunction with `next`.
_Reader `get`, `next`, `get_
lazy convert the fields on
access. This is starting to get complicated thought...)
Hopefully I've covered everything. Feedback welcomed :-)
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On 13/04/13 23:47, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 13/04/13 23:00, David Strauss wrote:
If seems like we should put the conditional special handling for
__REALTIME_TIMESTAMP and __MONOTONIC_TIMESTAMP in either _reader.c or
right in get().
Here's why:
* With the code above, calling Reade
'__REALTIME_TIMESTAMP'] = self.get_realtime()
+entry['__MONOTONIC_TIMESTAMP'] = self.get_monotonic()
+entry['__CURSOR'] = self.get_cursor()
+
+return entry
def query_unique(self, field):
"""Return unique values
On 13/04/13 00:00, Mirco Tischler wrote:
2013/4/12 Steven Hiscocks mailto:steven-syst...@hiscocks.me.uk>>
Hi,
I'm having two issues in relation to the journal with my recent
upgrade to v201.
One issue, is that it appears that "_MACHINE_ID" fie
introduced.
Both issues can be easily seen with journalctl output in "export"
format. I've seen this issue on two of Arch Linux x86_64 systems.
Thanks :)
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
try(
super(Reader, self).get_next(skip))
+entry['__REALTIME_TIMESTAMP'] = self.get_realtime()
+entry['__MONOTONIC_TIMESTAMP'] = self.get_monotonic()
+entry['__CURSOR'] = self.get_cursor()
+
+return entry
def query_unique(sel
t(us)
def seek_realtime(self, realtime):
"""Seek to a matching journal entry nearest to `realtime` time.
Thanks :)
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
nup can be done in the main tree. Thank you for the
module!
Zbyszek
Brilliant. Thank you for your patience, input and contributions. As you
may have noticed I'm a bit of a novice when it comes to C and the python
C-API,so you assistance was greatly appreciated.
--
On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pu
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commits to
https://github.com/keszybz/systemd/commits/python-systemd-reader
This is your tree but rebased onto my i
On 19/02/13 07:05, David Strauss wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Steven Hiscocks
wrote:
Sounds good. I suppose `log_level` should become `add_loglevel_matches` for
consistency. (or actually `add_priority_matches`?)
"Log level" is the Pythonic language; please continue usi
the converters failed.
--
David Strauss
| da...@davidstrauss.net
| +1 512 577 5827 [mobile]
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hiscocks
wrote:
On 11/02/13 05:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:57PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I thought th
On 11/02/13 05:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:57PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I thought the easiest way was to just inherit the Journal (now
_Journal), replacing __new__ with all the python RunString stuff.
https://github.com/kwirk/systemd/commit
On 08/02/13 20:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:51:48PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I
On 04/02/13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been develop
is is this the intended behaviour, or is this a bug?
Thanks :)
--
Steven Hiscocks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
31 matches
Mail list logo
