Hi there,
I'm wondering what the functional difference is between doing:
ExecStartPre=/bin/foo
ExecStart=/bin/bar
and
ExecStart=/bin/foo
ExecStart=/bin/bar
From my read of the systemd.service man page, they appear to have the
same behavior in the common use case.
The only difference I can
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/
The last tag in the repo is v215. Can someone push the v216 through v219?
- Steven
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
This is weird. I issued a 'mount' command, which succeeds, but then
systemd jumps in and immediately unmounts it. What's going on here?
Command issued:
mount -o loop,ro someisofile.iso /mnt
Journal shows this mess:
Mar 29 17:39:06 loki systemd[2460]: Unit mnt.mount is bound to
inactive unit.
29, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Steven Noonan ste...@uplinklabs.net
wrote:
This is weird. I issued a 'mount' command, which succeeds, but then
systemd jumps in and immediately unmounts it. What's going on here?
Command issued:
mount -o loop,ro someisofile.iso /mnt
Journal shows this mess:
Mar 29 17
Hi all,
Is anyone maintaining a patch series against upstream d-bus for kdbus
integration? I checked the kdbus-dev branch linked to by the kdbus
Google Code page:
https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=platform/upstream/dbus.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kdbus-dev
But it hasn't been updated in over a
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 12.11.14 09:57, Steven Noonan (ste...@uplinklabs.net) wrote:
Hi all,
I've been seeing this happen every now and then on a couple machines.
When I wake up in the morning and go to log in, I find X11
Forgot to explain my setup a bit:
Arch Linux, x86_64, systemd 217
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Steven Noonan ste...@uplinklabs.net wrote:
Hi all,
I've been seeing this happen every now and then on a couple machines.
When I wake up in the morning and go to log in, I find X11 stopped
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/12/2014 07:00 PM, Steven Noonan wrote:
What's the best way to approach debugging this issue? Should I do a
debug build to get a better core dump and wait for this to happen
again?
Looks like
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Steven Noonan ste...@uplinklabs.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/12/2014 07:00 PM, Steven Noonan wrote:
What's the best way to approach debugging this issue? Should I do a
debug build to get
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
---
src/hostname/hostnamectl.c | 20 +---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
There's a bug in the DHCPv6 implementation somewhere. systemd-networkd
was crashing every time it started, so I took a look in gdb:
# gdb /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-networkd
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.7.1
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
The docs say to use the section [DHCP] now, and [DHCPv4] is presumably
deprecated?
I'm getting this on systemd 215:
[/etc/systemd/network/bridge-dhcp.network:5] Unknown section 'DHCP'. Ignoring.
Looks like networkd-network.c still looks for DHCPv4:
r = config_parse(NULL, filename,
---
src/network/networkd-network.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/network/networkd-network.c b/src/network/networkd-network.c
index 9ab4f23..9f6de18 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-network.c
+++ b/src/network/networkd-network.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static
If client-lease is NULL, dhcp6_lease_clear_timers will cause a segmentation
fault.
---
src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp6-client.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp6-client.c
b/src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp6-client.c
index
14 matches
Mail list logo
