On Sat, 14.08.10 17:59, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said:
Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy
to rename this.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said:
Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy
to rename this.
]] Lennart Poettering
| So, maybe Type=transient is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this
| word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses
| that iirc) and describes pretty accurately what these kind of processes
| are used for, i.e. transient, temporary,
Am 13.08.2010 12:49, schrieb Claes H:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
So, maybe Type=transient is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this
word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses
that iirc) and describes pretty
On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
So [auditctl] would be something to set to Type=finish and
ValidNoProcess=no.
(Oh, and if you have a better suggestion for a name of ValidNoProcess= I
am all ears too!)
'RequiresProcess='?
Hmm, that would turn around the
upstart jobs have two main types - 'services' and 'tasks'. systemd, while it
has many other types, doesn't have a 'task' analogue. So, for anything that
has the semantics of a task (at this time/dependency, do this thing and
exit), ends up being encoded as a service of type 'finish', often
with
