On Fri, 08.03.13 17:48, Oleksii Shevchuk (alx...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Lennart, thanks for answer, but probably I mean something else.
>
> set-cgroup-attr creates drop-in with ControlGroupAttribute= for unit. Why
> don't
> have something like
>
> systemctl set unit.service ControlGroupAttribu
Lennart, thanks for answer, but probably I mean something else.
set-cgroup-attr creates drop-in with ControlGroupAttribute= for unit. Why don't
have something like
systemctl set unit.service ControlGroupAttribute="cpu.shared 2000"
systemctl set unit.service ConditionPathExists=/run/blah
and s
On Fri, 08.03.13 16:53, Oleksii Shevchuk (alx...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > In fact, the drop-in logic I added primarily to have a nice place
> > where "set-cgroup-attr" could be made persistent.
>
> Maybe it's better to have generic interface for setting parameters,
> instead of this specific one?
> In fact, the drop-in logic I added primarily to have a nice place
> where "set-cgroup-attr" could be made persistent.
Maybe it's better to have generic interface for setting parameters,
instead of this specific one?
___
systemd-devel mailing list
syste
On Fri, 08.03.13 10:47, Holger Winkelmann (h...@travelping.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the quick look. Thats What I thought anyway by reading the
> announcement.
> which means deleting the directories will bring the system in the sate the
> service
> unit author or the admin intended, s
On Fri, 08.03.13 10:39, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > > >> * Resource limits (as exposed by the various control group
> > > >> controllers) can now be controlled dynamically at r
On Fri, 08.03.13 06:31, Holger Winkelmann (h...@travelping.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Nice to see that... seems it was time for a release... ;-)
>
> a few questions in line:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hey!
> >
> > Finally, here's 198, with many big changes:
> >
> >
> > * Reso
Hi,
Thanks for the quick look. Thats What I thought anyway by reading the
announcement.
which means deleting the directories will bring the system in the sate the
service
unit author or the admin intended, sweet...
Let see where this concept evolves in terms of general settings for a particular
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
> HI,
>
> > >> * Resource limits (as exposed by the various control group
> > >> controllers) can now be controlled dynamically at runtime
> > >> for all units. More specifically, you can now use a comma
HI,
> >> * Resource limits (as exposed by the various control group
> >> controllers) can now be controlled dynamically at runtime
> >> for all units. More specifically, you can now use a command
> >> like "systemctl set-cgroup-attr foobar.service cpu.shares
>
Am 08.03.2013 06:31, schrieb Holger Winkelmann:
> - Original Message -
>> Hey!
>>
>> Finally, here's 198, with many big changes:
>>
>>
>> * Resource limits (as exposed by the various control group
>> controllers) can now be controlled dynamically at runtime
>>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:31:45AM +0100, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
> > * The Python API of systemd now gained a new module for
> > reading journal files.
>
> Are the problems with jumping to the end of the journal fixed?
No. But something like
j.seek_tail()
j.get_next(-1
Hi,
Nice to see that... seems it was time for a release... ;-)
a few questions in line:
- Original Message -
> Hey!
>
> Finally, here's 198, with many big changes:
>
>
> * Resource limits (as exposed by the various control group
> controllers) can now be controlled d
Hey!
Finally, here's 198, with many big changes:
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-198.tar.xz
In detail:
* Configuration of unit files may now be extended via drop-in
files without having to edit/override the unit files
themselves. More specifically
14 matches
Mail list logo
