Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-26 Thread Kai Krakow
Mathieu Bridon schrieb: > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 23:08 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> * A new unit file option AppArmoreProfile= has been added to >> set the AppArmor profile for the processes of a unit. > > I think that should be « AppArmorProfile= », not « AppArmoreProfil

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-26 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 25/02/14 13:29 did gyre and gimble: > On Tue, 25.02.14 13:05, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > >> >> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 24/02/14 22:08 did gyre and gimble: >>> * systemd will now understand the usual M, K, G, T suf

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-25 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 2014-02-24 23:08, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> >>CHANGES WITH 210: >> >>* logind is now a lot more aggressive when suspending the >> machine due to a closed laptop lid. Instead of acting only >> on the lid

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Monday 2014-02-24 23:08, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >CHANGES WITH 210: > >* logind is now a lot more aggressive when suspending the > machine due to a closed laptop lid. Instead of acting only > on the lid close action it will continuously watch the lid > sta

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 25.02.14 13:05, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > > 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 24/02/14 22:08 did gyre and gimble: > > * systemd will now understand the usual M, K, G, T suffixes > > according to SI conventions (i.e. to the base 1000) when > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-25 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 24/02/14 22:08 did gyre and gimble: > * systemd will now understand the usual M, K, G, T suffixes > according to SI conventions (i.e. to the base 1000) when > referring to throughput and hardware metrics. It will stay >

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-24 Thread Cecil Westerhof
On 02/25/2014 01:30 AM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: logind is now a lot more aggressive when suspending the machine due to a closed laptop lid. Instead of acting only on the lid close action it will continuously w

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 25.02.14 09:04, Mathieu Bridon (boche...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 23:08 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > * A new unit file option AppArmoreProfile= has been added to > > set the AppArmor profile for the processes of a unit. > > I think tha

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 24.02.14 16:30, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > logind is now a lot more aggressive when suspending the > > machine due to a closed laptop lid. Instead of acting only > > on the

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-24 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 23:08 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > * A new unit file option AppArmoreProfile= has been added to > set the AppArmor profile for the processes of a unit. I think that should be « AppArmorProfile= », not « AppArmoreProfile= ». At least that's what system

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-24 Thread David Timothy Strauss
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > logind is now a lot more aggressive when suspending the > machine due to a closed laptop lid. Instead of acting only > on the lid close action it will continuously watch the lid > status and act on it. This

[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 210

2014-02-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, And here's the next release 210: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-210.tar.xz Many bugfixes, but also a couple of new features (see below). One of the more relevant changes is that the compatibility library support no longer makes use of IFUNC. This allows them to build