2015-06-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
Lot's of last minute changes. Especially
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/293
really sucks.
While I'm still disappointed how this issue was handled and I still
Kay Sievers wrote on 20/06/15 20:49:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we
2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd-bus and how to use it will
follow
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
sd-event.h
I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
Lot's of last minute changes. Especially
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/293
really sucks.
Not amused, not amused at all.
2015-06-19 16:06 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Heya!
It's primarily a
All this talk about getting downstream patches upstream and then last
minute reverts without a proper justitification. WTF.
2015-06-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
Lot's of last minute changes. Especially
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:11, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
Lot's of last minute changes.
I disagree. We only made bugfixes in the last days, except maybe one
patch (that came with a lot of unit tests). That's how this
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:21, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
All this talk about getting downstream patches upstream and then last
minute reverts without a proper justitification. WTF.
reverts? Plural? Which ones are you referring to excluding that man
page path thing?
Lennart
--
Lennart
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd-bus and how to use it will
follow shortly.)
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-221.tar.xz
Reminder: Note again that the git repository and bug tracking moved to
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
same service name, and the user executes
Guys let's try to be constructive here...
This time it shouldn't be too painful for downstreams since the revert
was the last patch to the man subtree so just a git revert of that
should get your trees to the state you need to get v221 packages for
Debian and Ubuntu. In that sense, I think we're
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
same service name, and the user executes systemctl enable
for it (or a related
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
same service name, and the user executes systemctl enable
for it (or a related call), then this will now enable both
(or execute the related
В Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:15:03 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net пишет:
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
same service name, and the user executes systemctl enable
for it
2015-06-19 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:29, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
If something is not in shape we'll revert it. Regardless of the
general merits of the patch set: this one actually broke stuff, it
was incomplete. Either
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:40, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-06-19 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:29, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
If something is not in shape we'll revert it. Regardless of the
general merits of the
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@google.com wrote:
Guys let's try to be constructive here...
This time it shouldn't be too painful for downstreams since the revert
was the last patch to the man subtree so just a git revert of that
should get your trees to the
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd-bus and how to use it will
follow shortly.)
The blog story is online now:
18 matches
Mail list logo
