On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:20:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 27.10.14 20:16, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:38:37PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 11.10.14 21:57, m...@zarb.org (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
From: Michael Scherer
On Sat, 11.10.14 21:57, m...@zarb.org (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
From: Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org
Since apparmor need to access /proc to communicate with the kernel,
any unit setting / as readonly will be unable to also use the
AppArmorProfile setting, as found on debian bug 760526.
A unit
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:38:37PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 11.10.14 21:57, m...@zarb.org (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
From: Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org
Since apparmor need to access /proc to communicate with the kernel,
any unit setting / as readonly will be unable to also
On Mon, 27.10.14 20:16, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:38:37PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 11.10.14 21:57, m...@zarb.org (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
From: Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org
Since apparmor need to access /proc to communicate
Am 27.10.2014 um 23:20 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 27.10.14 20:16, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:38:37PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 11.10.14 21:57, m...@zarb.org (m...@zarb.org) wrote:
From: Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org
Since
From: Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org
Since apparmor need to access /proc to communicate with the kernel,
any unit setting / as readonly will be unable to also use the
AppArmorProfile setting, as found on debian bug 760526.
---
src/core/execute.c | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 10