On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:16:17PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:19:27AM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:20:18PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
BTW, for SELinux we remove
On Nov 12, 2013 6:16 AM, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:19:27AM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:20:18PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
BTW, for SELinux we remove
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:20:18PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
BTW, for SELinux we remove selinux specific mount options in
userspace (in mount(8)) if the kernel does not support selinux.
It help us to make command line or fstab setting independent on the
current kernel features.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:20:18PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
BTW, for SELinux we remove selinux specific mount options in
userspace (in mount(8)) if the kernel does not support selinux.
It help us to make command
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 29.10.13 16:02, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
Hmm, here's an idea: there has been a long standig feature request to
add a configurable boolean to mount unit files that controls
/bin/mount's -s
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 29.10.13 16:02, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
Hmm, here's an idea: there has been a long standig feature request to
add a configurable boolean to mount unit files that controls
/bin/mount's -s
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 29.10.13 16:02, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
Hmm, here's an idea: there has been a long standig feature request to
add a
On 10/29/2013 07:48 AM, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 28.10.13 12:59, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On
On Tue, 29.10.13 16:02, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
Hmm, here's an idea: there has been a long standig feature request to
add a configurable boolean to mount unit files that controls
/bin/mount's -s switch. Let's say we call it
SloppyOptions=yes/no, or so. Then, we could
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:02 AM, WaLyong Cho walyong@samsung.com wrote:
How about add specific options for smack? According to
http://schaufler-ca.com/description_from_the_linux_source_tree
Smack supports some mount options:
smackfsdef=label: specifies the label to give files that
At the same reason of /run and /dev/shm, when systemd is running with
SMACK, countless tasks are failed by missed privilege.
To avoid, /tmp is assigned '*' label.
---
Makefile.am| 10 ++
configure.ac |4 +++-
units/tmp.mount| 20
On Mon, 28.10.13 19:44, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
At the same reason of /run and /dev/shm, when systemd is running with
SMACK, countless tasks are failed by missed privilege.
To avoid, /tmp is assigned '*' label.
Won't this break if people compile systemd with SMACK enabled
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:44 AM, WaLyong Cho walyong@samsung.com wrote:
At the same reason of /run and /dev/shm, when systemd is running with
SMACK, countless tasks are failed by missed privilege.
To avoid, /tmp is assigned '*' label.
We discussed this problem earlier in our office last
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 28.10.13 19:44, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
At the same reason of /run and /dev/shm, when systemd is running with
SMACK, countless tasks are failed by missed privilege.
To avoid, /tmp is
On Mon, 28.10.13 12:59, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 28.10.13 19:44, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
At the same reason of /run and /dev/shm, when systemd is
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 28.10.13 12:59, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 28.10.13 19:44, WaLyong Cho
16 matches
Mail list logo
