On Tue, 25.03.14 09:32, Benjamin SANS (b...@ziirish.info) wrote:
> * On Monday, 24 March 2014 23:24, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > No grokking what this is about really? What do you need the param for,
> > why isn't the existing agent logic good enough for this? Do you need
> > some ident
* On Monday, 24 March 2014 23:24, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> No grokking what this is about really? What do you need the param for,
> why isn't the existing agent logic good enough for this? Do you need
> some identifier to pass across, or what is supposed to be included
> there?
>
The goal
On Thu, 13.03.14 18:29, Benjamin SANS (b...@ziirish.info) wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Following this thread:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-July/005835.html,
> I understand you don't want to support a "keyscript" option as implemented in
> that patch.
>
> So I wrote these
Hi,
As I said in my previous message, the patch I sent was untested but the goal is
to have some feedback about the way to do it.
I successfully patched the debian wheezy's systemd to make this new option work.
Here is what the patch does. Please let me know if it is the right way to do it
and i
Hi list,
Following this thread:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-July/005835.html,
I understand you don't want to support a "keyscript" option as implemented in
that patch.
So I wrote these few lines to support a new "keyhandler" option (so that you
don't necessary need
