On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 11.03.14 18:14, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>> Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
>> and causes broken symlinks to be installed.
>
> Hmm, wouldn't it be nicer to just drop the
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 11.03.14 18:14, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>>
>>> Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
>>> and causes broken symlinks to
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 11.03.14 18:14, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>> Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
>> and causes broken symlinks to be installed.
>
> Hmm, wouldn't it be nicer to just drop the
On Tue, 11.03.14 18:14, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
> and causes broken symlinks to be installed.
Hmm, wouldn't it be nicer to just drop the --relative here?
Quite honestly, I don't grok the code, neither the
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
> and causes broken symlinks to be installed.
Actually, I think the the symlinks are not "broken" under normal
circumstances (rootlibdir = /lib). However, they end up wi
Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
and causes broken symlinks to be installed.
---
Makefile.am | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 182eca6..bd78f44 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@
