On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:53 AM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> My attempts to discuss options and
> approaches with you at LinuxCon, on the mailing list, and IRC have
> only been marginally productive. Before my commit, we only had a TODO
> logged.
Actually, I'm being a bit unfair here. Most of
I'm disappointed in your response here. It's not up to your normally
high standards of technical discourse and tact on this mailing list. I
realize I've stepped on some feet, but there's quite a bit more to
this than me getting trigger-happy with a core commit.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Le
On Tue, 19.11.13 17:12, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
>
> I'm pretty confident in the accuracy of the controller mask
> aggregation, especially given the new unit test. Here are the main
> review questions.
Ahum. Please do not just commit stuff like this that is not obvio
I'm pretty confident in the accuracy of the controller mask
aggregation, especially given the new unit test. Here are the main
review questions.
Is it okay to couple realizing the cgroups and applying the attributes
the way the patch does? Before, we were often applying the attributes
for all of a
From: David Strauss
---
.gitignore | 1 +
Makefile.am | 13 +++
src/core/cgroup.c | 94 +++--
src/core/cgroup.h | 2 +
src/core/unit.c | 8 +++-
src/core/unit.h | 1 +
src
