On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:53:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 22.09.14 16:33, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when
On Thu, 09.10.14 09:58, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hmm, also, we already have a really bad formatter in place for the
journal catalog files (which only replaces @foo@ by the value of field
foo). We should probably use the same code for this new journalctl
formatter
On Mon, 22.09.14 16:33, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when reading application logs it
is often desirable to display the code file
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when reading application logs it
is often desirable to display the code file name,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:43:28PM -0400, Daurnimator wrote:
On 22 September 2014 11:33, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when
[Strangely, this thread up in my inbox rather than my systemd Maildir.]
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:43:28PM -0400, Daurnimator wrote:
On 22 September 2014 11:33, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats,
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when reading application logs it
is often desirable to display the code file name, line number
and function name. Rather than defining yet more fixed
On 22 September 2014 11:33, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when reading application logs it
is often desirable to display the code file
On Monday 22 September 2014 at 12:43:28, Daurnimator wrote:
On 22 September 2014 11:33, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
The current '--output FORMAT' argument defines a number of
common output formats, but there are some useful cases it
does cover. In particular when
10 matches
Mail list logo
