On Mon, 29.12.14 15:14, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 29.12.14 09:07, Matthias Urlichs (matth...@urlichs.de) wrote:
> >
> >> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Graber
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > My host system d
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:32:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 28.12.14 18:18, Stéphane Graber (stephane.gra...@canonical.com) wrote:
>
> > My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
> > but it was my understanding that nspawn didn't support user namespac
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:43:37PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> Tom Gundersen [2014-12-29 2:22 +0100]:
> > The bug should now be fixed in git. Please let me know if you still
> > experience problems.
>
> Nice! I confirm that the "systemd spins 100% CPU for about one
> minute" when bo
Hi,
Lennart Poettering:
> I am open to adding support for this, but I think the allocation of
> the UID ranges should really happen automatically, and not be
> something the admin has to manually assign.
>
> Which means we'd enter dynamic UID allocation terroritory, and that
> opens a huge can of
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 29.12.14 09:07, Matthias Urlichs (matth...@urlichs.de) wrote:
>
>> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Graber
>> > wrote:
>> > > My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
>> > > but it was my
Hey Tom,
Tom Gundersen [2014-12-29 2:22 +0100]:
> The bug should now be fixed in git. Please let me know if you still
> experience problems.
Nice! I confirm that the "systemd spins 100% CPU for about one
minute" when booting an user level container is indeed fixed now. I
can't test it much furth
On Mon, 29.12.14 09:07, Matthias Urlichs (matth...@urlichs.de) wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Graber
> > wrote:
> > > My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
> > > but it was my understanding that nspawn didn't support user namespaces
> > > and
On Sun, 28.12.14 18:18, Stéphane Graber (stephane.gra...@canonical.com) wrote:
> My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
> but it was my understanding that nspawn didn't support user namespaces
> and uid/gid mappings which is what I'm working with here.
Note that sy
Hi,
Tom Gundersen:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Graber
> wrote:
> > My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
> > but it was my understanding that nspawn didn't support user namespaces
> > and uid/gid mappings which is what I'm working with here.
>
> I
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Graber
> wrote:
>> My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
>> but it was my understanding that nspawn didn't support user namespaces
>> and uid/gid mappings which is w
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Graber
wrote:
> My host system doesn't have nspawn so I can't easily test it this way,
> but it was my understanding that nspawn didn't support user namespaces
> and uid/gid mappings which is what I'm working with here.
Indeed, that is not supported by ns
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I'm forwarding a patch for the loopback setup from Stéphane. I already
> pushed one part of it as
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=58a489c
> which is trivial and obvious, but the other part isn't.
Thanks fo
Hello all,
I'm forwarding a patch for the loopback setup from Stéphane. I already
pushed one part of it as
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=58a489c
which is trivial and obvious, but the other part isn't.
Thanks,
Martin
- Forwarded message from Stéphane Graber -
13 matches
Mail list logo
