On 12/15/2014 06:27 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 15.12.14 08:01, Ken Werner (k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
From: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone()
system call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked
From: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone() system
call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Signed-off-by: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
src/nspawn/nspawn.c |6 +++---
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:06:41PM +0100, Ken Werner wrote:
From: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone() system
call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Applied.
Zbyszek
From: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone()
system call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Signed-off-by: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
src/nspawn/nspawn.c |8
1 files changed,
On Mon, 15.12.14 08:01, Ken Werner (k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
From: Ken Werner k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone()
system call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Signed-off-by: Ken Werner
