>
> Sorry, still not getting what you want to say.
>
> Mayb ethere is some confusion regarding what .idx actually is? .idx is
Yes, it proved that I was wrong, that patch is right only and only when
both items' idx is NULL, this apparently not the case.
Please ignore that patch, thanks for your
On Mon, 16.12.13 13:15, Yang Chengwei (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:57:39AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 16.12.13 04:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16.12.13 11:03, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.c
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:57:39AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 16.12.13 04:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 16.12.13 11:03, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
> >
> > > the swap() operation of prioq which in fact only swap item's
On Mon, 16.12.13 04:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16.12.13 11:03, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
>
> > the swap() operation of prioq which in fact only swap item's data but
> > keep idx untouched. However, current implement does first swap the
On Mon, 16.12.13 11:03, Chengwei Yang (chengwei.y...@intel.com) wrote:
> the swap() operation of prioq which in fact only swap item's data but
> keep idx untouched. However, current implement does first swap the idx
> and then swap back again.
Sorry, I do understand? Can you elaborate, please? Is
the swap() operation of prioq which in fact only swap item's data but
keep idx untouched. However, current implement does first swap the idx
and then swap back again.
---
src/shared/prioq.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/prioq.c b/src/shared/prioq.c
ind
