On Wed, 20.11.13 05:49, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >From 9975141544c83942f522d0530ce8d1704d49f983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dan Walsh
> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:52:37 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix SELinux check for snapshot creation.
>
> SELinux does not have a path to ch
And I obviously attached wrong file...this is the right one, sorry
St 20. listopad 2013, 05:47:36 CET, Václav Pavlín napsal:
Út 19. listopad 2013, 15:16:47 CET, Michal Sekletar napsal:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Has
Út 19. listopad 2013, 15:16:47 CET, Michal Sekletar napsal:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2013 05:45 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On
11/16
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/18/2013 05:45 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On
> > 11/16/2013 08:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2013 05:45 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On
> 11/16/2013 08:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 14.11.13 15:43, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/16/2013 08:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Thu, 14.11.13 15:43, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/2013 08:10 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.11.13 15:43, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/14/2013 12:50 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2013 11:12 PM,
On Thu, 14.11.13 15:43, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/14/2013 12:50 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > On 11/05/2013 11:12 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> On 11/05/2013 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> >> Ok lets add a c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/14/2013 12:50 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 11:12 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 11/05/2013 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> Ok lets add a check that checks for start on a service labeled with the
>> remote process label, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/05/2013 11:12 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> Ok lets add a check that checks for start on a service labeled with the remote
> process label, then we can add rules like
>
> allow systemd_logind_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/05/2013 12:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Ok lets add a check that checks for start on a service labeled with the remote
process label, then we can add rules like
allow systemd_logind_t self:service start
Or we can make it simpler and have t
On Mon, 04.11.13 15:05, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/04/2013 02:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 04.11.13 17:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 31.10.13 15:51, Vaclav Pavl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 02:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 04.11.13 17:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31.10.13 15:51, Vaclav Pavlin (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>>> From: Václav Pavlín
>>
>> Sorry, I don't un
On Mon, 04.11.13 17:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Thu, 31.10.13 15:51, Vaclav Pavlin (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > From: Václav Pavlín
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what this patch is doing. Please explain in a
> commit message!
Hmm, so, here's another idea. T
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand what this patch is doing. Please explain in a
> commit message!
The file format should also be documented in the code itself, if not
done by selinx, then we need to add the link to the doc.
>> ---
>> src/core
On Thu, 31.10.13 15:51, Vaclav Pavlin (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> From: Václav Pavlín
Sorry, I don't understand what this patch is doing. Please explain in a
commit message!
>
> ---
> src/core/selinux-access.c | 59
> ++-
> src/core/selinux-acces
From: Václav Pavlín
---
src/core/selinux-access.c | 59 ++-
src/core/selinux-access.h | 15 +---
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/selinux-access.c b/src/core/selinux-access.c
index 0a3ee18..5908a79 100644
17 matches
Mail list logo
